Moore. I think as we said the unit design is tree appropriate and appropriate for that this location not a change in buildings but a general attitude that captures what will reflect the historic conservation nature this is as fast the department themselves has to comment on the green glazing no green glazing on the ground floor and the window detailing and how that is done is probably wag theyll talk about. Just to be clear the motion will be that with the approval with the condition that primary facade be reviewed by the architectureal review committee toe give advise on hangs that are more in keeping with the secretary of interior standard tsf. Director rahaim you caught that well, i mean all the other things are part of what they hear to wasnt were talking about anyway so, yes. Why not. Do you see a problem City Attorney. Deputy City Attorney kate stacy commissioners, i think what our scoring for at least with with respect to the Architectural Review Committee is that Planning Depar
Harrison street a large project authorization at the time of issuance was proposed jill july 14th but now staff is requesting it be continued to august 11, 2016, a notification issue that needs to be renoticed i know your calendars are impacted on august 4th and 11 have a couple of more continuances to consider that request to august 11th and further under your reading for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency informational presentation theyre requesting a one week continuance to july 14th items 14 ab for cases at the fulsome street large project authorization and conditional use authorization is requesting a continuance to august 4th under the discretionary review item 15 for case at the jackson street discretionary review both parties the project sponsor and the dr requesters are in agreement to continue this matter i believe theyre on the vertical of an agreement in a withdrawal today well continue to october 13th. Okay i have no further items proposed for continuance an
Keith demartini martini, its my pleasure to present an overview of this fiscal years supplemental appropriation for our department and secretary iowna and i have copies. As director rahaim mentioned this is a supplemental budget appropriation for this currently four. Under charter section 4. 1024. 3 the department is requesting will be requesting the Planning Commissions approval of our request, when we come back next week. They a an agenda idea for next weeks agenda on this. So just before i get started with the details of the supplemental appropriation request i will have an overview of what we are projecting as far as revenues and expenditures which is the basis for our request. In this current year fiscal year budget we did assume overall volume projected growth of approximately 3 from last fiscal year and through about six months of actual data that weve been able to analyze so far through december, we are experiencing that 3 growth approximately, with some variation among some of
Welcome everyone back to san franciscos Planning Commission regular hearing for thursday, january 17, 2013. We left off just before your regular calendar, so we will proceed to item 10. Fiscal year 201213 supplemental budget appropriation. This is a nonaction item and its only informational. Thank you opinion good afternoon, commissioners. John rahaim, Planning Department. We are here today with the first of two budget items this week. This item is actually for this fiscal year, and then we are proposing a supplemental budget request for this year. We are in an unusual situation this year, where our revenues have exceeded expectations because of the increased numbers of applications. As you know, the vast majority of the revenues of the Department Come from fee revenues from proposed projects. So we are proposing this year to go back to the board, before the end of the fiscal year, and propose the use of some supplemental funds. The next item is the first of several discussions on the
Supplemental request and how the rest of the year pans out. Moving on to the expenditure side we are expecting very little variation in our salaries and fringe expenditures and our other expenditures whether it be from materials and supplies, capital, work orders that we have with other city agencies that perform services for us, such as the city attorney. So were expecting very little variation. So over all, we are expecting a surplus in our budget of over 6 million. That being said, we are coming forward with a supplemental appropriation request of approximately 3 million. I want to walk you through what the details of that request is. And is is broken down into two pieces. Let me first say that once this once this appropriation request is allocated, it will prove resources to reducing the backlog of cases that is requiring review, and funding some currently underfunded commitments. These resources will mostly go towards staff resources, as well as additional appropriation authority