Moore. I think as we said the unit design is tree appropriate and appropriate for that this location not a change in buildings but a general attitude that captures what will reflect the historic conservation nature this is as fast the department themselves has to comment on the green glazing no green glazing on the ground floor and the window detailing and how that is done is probably wag theyll talk about. Just to be clear the motion will be that with the approval with the condition that primary facade be reviewed by the architectureal review committee toe give advise on hangs that are more in keeping with the secretary of interior standard tsf. Director rahaim you caught that well, i mean all the other things are part of what they hear to wasnt were talking about anyway so, yes. Why not. Do you see a problem City Attorney. Deputy City Attorney kate stacy commissioners, i think what our scoring for at least with with respect to the Architectural Review Committee is that Planning Depar
Harrison street a large project authorization at the time of issuance was proposed jill july 14th but now staff is requesting it be continued to august 11, 2016, a notification issue that needs to be renoticed i know your calendars are impacted on august 4th and 11 have a couple of more continuances to consider that request to august 11th and further under your reading for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency informational presentation theyre requesting a one week continuance to july 14th items 14 ab for cases at the fulsome street large project authorization and conditional use authorization is requesting a continuance to august 4th under the discretionary review item 15 for case at the jackson street discretionary review both parties the project sponsor and the dr requesters are in agreement to continue this matter i believe theyre on the vertical of an agreement in a withdrawal today well continue to october 13th. Okay i have no further items proposed for continuance an