Any facts. Here, well, i, as a journalist, have to use official sources and then, put a full stop, or if you dont put a full stop, you are an investigative journalist, you have a lot for, well, we all have the passion, of course, but this is your profession, to investigate, and then you write inquiries, search, find out, look for some insiders, and then it may turn out that it turns out that someone simply said that such a thing did not happen, but that actually happened, and that it turns out that the hungarian customs did not say anything at all and did not. thats just how we were told that they asked, we dont know, we are only now referring to the explanation from transcarpathian customs, but again, these are words, so we accept it as a fact, as a statement of the transcarpathian customs, a part of the state Customs Service that controls certain entryexit points, but if this case continues and it turns out that even these words are not all true, then of course there can be a continu
The telethon, but we still remember very well what the ukrainian media market was like, the extremely large and harmful influence the socalled oligarchs had on the editorial policy of many channels, and we perfectly understand that this cannot be allowed in any case, so against the background of such Serious Problems in information. Field in the information market, in the media market, in general i am afraid that today we will not be able to get such ideal and Beautiful Solutions in order to achieve these two goals and to allow the free, fairly Free Development of the media and to prevent a situation where, through these media, our enemy begins to seriously influence again. The information policy of the state and the formation of this information field, so lets, lets still, its good that this discussion is going on, and lets not bend the peacock, so to speak, as our partners have repeatedly assessed the state of the media in ukraine, which exists, paid attention to the fact that even i
The Audit Service will check with regard to our information field. And the fact that there are problems with unreasoned disconnection of channels, because well, if you could tell a lot, but even during a war , the authorities can and should act only in a. Legal way, that is , there are no opportunities to argue the disconnection, here or there is a need for it sum up some norms in one number, or at least explain why it was done, admit that it was a mistake and let it be normal to speak, because something in two, more than two years of warnings, if there were no channels to work, well, even though there are stop lists, well, for example , initially fullscale i have also never been accused of intruding on a live channel, but somehow i am far from convinced that you have any blacklists, well, its just that the owners of this channel probably dont like me for something, but less so, this is an editorial policy, about which we can say that what is stated in the report of the department and
Young officers who have recently been mobilized after Training Centers, personnel officers are a minority, lets say yes, in principle, they first work in the same way with their soldiers, on training grounds, they additionally undergo the same training that soldiers undergo, and then we work with them separately, their mentors work conditionally with them, their. Which the experience of managing people at Different Levels conveys exactly what an officer needs to know, sergeants, in principle, we have the opportunity to send to Training Centers for some basic leadership courses, basic sergeant courses, and yet the bulk of sergeants are proactive soldiers whom we we consider on the spot from the newly arrived personnel, or those who have already shown themselves in. And we try as much as possible to give people the opportunity to grow, and those who show themselves, show a desire to work, show their skills, leadership, skills management, he has a constant growth, constantly receives the
Is done now can be discussed for a long time, but, in my opinion, no one objects the need for military censorship, for a general state policy that would still allow us to control the Information Space, in which, unfortunately, our enemy sometimes quite successfully attacks us, and to a great extent. We see also a lot examples of how, for one reason or another , representatives of various opposition political forces, to some extent, i would say, even join in such a general campaign to discredit this policy of control, so for me, as a nonspecialist in the media sphere media market, it is difficult to see. Are there any specific objections regarding how this work on the redistribution of slots was organized, why and for what technical reasons, including whether certain channels were or were not included in the production of products for telethon, but we remember very well what the ukrainian media market was like, which. The socalled oligarchs had an extremely large and harmful influence o