The telethon, but we still remember very well what the ukrainian media market was like, the extremely large and harmful influence the socalled oligarchs had on the editorial policy of many channels, and we perfectly understand that this cannot be allowed in any case, so against the background of such Serious Problems in information. Field in the information market, in the media market, in general i am afraid that today we will not be able to get such ideal and Beautiful Solutions in order to achieve these two goals and to allow the free, fairly Free Development of the media and to prevent a situation where, through these media, our enemy begins to seriously influence again. The information policy of the state and the formation of this information field, so lets, lets still, its good that this discussion is going on, and lets not bend the peacock, so to speak, as our partners have repeatedly assessed the state of the media in ukraine, which exists, paid attention to the fact that even i
Is done now can be discussed for a long time, but, in my opinion, no one objects the need for military censorship, for a general state policy that would still allow us to control the Information Space, in which, unfortunately, our enemy sometimes quite successfully attacks us, and to a great extent. We see also a lot examples of how, for one reason or another , representatives of various opposition political forces, to some extent, i would say, even join in such a general campaign to discredit this policy of control, so for me, as a nonspecialist in the media sphere media market, it is difficult to see. Are there any specific objections regarding how this work on the redistribution of slots was organized, why and for what technical reasons, including whether certain channels were or were not included in the production of products for telethon, but we remember very well what the ukrainian media market was like, which. The socalled oligarchs had an extremely large and harmful influence o