sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa
congresswoman maloney inma a letter that they had already gotten 15 boxes from trump. so again, we have a lot of questions and pretty minimal answers joininining meg me nowit is wisconsin senator ron johnson, who sits on the homeland securityd and governmental affairs committee. senator , welcome . this senator,ooks prett is pretty sea i mean, biden ids fbi raided the home of hise no political opponent. do we not deserve to know why? you knowt deserve to know why? well, rachel , absolutely. g you know, to me, this just pow seems to be a dispute regardingr presidential power in terms of classifying declassifying desk, ing andeclassifying documents. o and i thought the most afd i thought the most interesting part of the affidavit was exhibit a letter written by trump s attorney thaump s t points outya hopefully that the president has absolutet thower when it comes to declassifying material and that hisat actions regarding classification declassification are not subject to legal sanction.