that being, said two pieces of evidence that really show us that the justice morgan is looking very closely at the events of january six, as well as the fake electors scheme that they are already investigating, and the rally organizers that they already investigating with a grand jury. attorney garland said, earlier in the last month of the january 6th hearings, that he had asked the legal counsel at the justice department whether he was to open investigation into the former president. he was told he wasn t. and then more recently he said that a news conference, we are getting rather, philip actually. no prisoners above the law. nobody is above the law. we made that clear in the most recent significant. there is one pattern that has kind of popped up again and again and again, which is the absence of evidence. whether deliberately or not. serving the text messages, presidential call logs, daily giant diary from january six. even the photographer being unable to take voters of the
carried out some of them. good morning. that includes more than 50 attacks on pro-life groups and houses of worship since the leak of the roe v. wade case. jane s revenge declared open season on pro-life groups and organizations promising to take increasingly drastic measures against oppressive infrastructures and prompted senator cotton to call for attorney garland s resignation over inaction in demanding that group be investigated as a terrorist organization. writing in a lefter quote if you are unwilling to protect americans from these attacks you should resign. although in my opinion you should resign in any case. the d.o.j. responded this morning in a statement telling fox news the f.b.i. is investigating a series of attacks and threats targeting pregnancy resource centers and faith based organizations across the country. the f.b.i. takes all threats seriously and we continue to work closely with law
yesterday s decision is that the it just reemphasizes that the evidence ultimately leads to the oval office. i don t have any reason to believe that judge garland won t be doing that. on the other hand, if there were more direct proceedings looking into that, even grand jury proceedings, witnesses would begin to talk and we would start to have news stories about people being called into a grand jury. all of that said, it is not necessarily a bad tactic for the justice department to allow the january 6th committee, which has been doing a yeoman s job of collecting some of the evidence and studying it as it comes in. so, you know, i think i hold out hope that this will actually lead to some action. i think it is important that it lead to some action or at least a determination whether or not a prosecution could be made. this is the way we have to defend our democracy. i mean we don t have to take up
state conflicts of interests and act accordingly. hey, george. good morning. it is jonathan lemire. former president trump yesterday put out a detailed statement in the wake of the allegation goes in which he went on about a golf shot, an alleged hole in one that he hit and spent a lot of time on that. give us your sense here in terms of what this could mean for the january 6th committee. like in terms of what opening do they have here, both in terms of the public relations and the politics but also the legal aspect of this. and as all of washington waits, what is attorney general merrick garland waiting for? well, we don t know what he is doing. i mean it is possible you know, he promised in his speech, attorney garland, back in january that he would be working his way, the attorney the justice department would be working its way up the chain, and the way they do in organized crime cases. they will follow the evidence wherever it leads. i think that the big result of