yesterday's decision is that the -- it just reemphasizes that the evidence ultimately leads to the oval office. i don't have any reason to believe that judge garland won't be doing that. on the other hand, if there were more direct proceedings looking into that, even grand jury proceedings, witnesses would begin to talk and we would start to have news stories about people being called into a grand jury. all of that said, it is not necessarily a bad tactic for the justice department to allow the january 6th committee, which has been doing a yeoman's job of collecting some of the evidence and studying it as it comes in. so, you know, i think i hold out hope that this will actually lead to some action. i think it is important that it lead to some action or at least a determination whether or not a prosecution could be made. this is the way we have to defend our democracy. i mean we don't have to take up