obstruction of justice. it is not, as chuck schumer said on the floor of the senate, a reason for disqualification of barr to the contrary, it is actually a very good reason to confirm somebody like william barr. he lays out how the firing of james comey s not obstruction of justice. the law is very specific on obstruction. i devote an entire chapter in my book to it. has to be a corrupt purpose that involves a lie, threat, bribe, concealing of evidence, destruction of documents or falsifying information. the firing of james comey is none of those things, even comey grudgingly admitted in his testimony, the president was entitled to fire him for a reason or no reason at all. so again, the media and democrats say, oh, barr must recuse himself or he is disqualified, frankly, they don t know what they are talking about. they have never read their recusal regulations in the code of federal regulations. dan: david, i ll go to you next. your legal opinion on the
have actual legislators there that are earning their taxpayer dollars that we are paying for their salary so that moving forward, our immigration and border security stance will be clear. dan: take up residence deal. a lot of these people, they complete the president being anti-immigrant but the president offered them a deal on daca. give them border security.ts they are not interested in it the democrats want open borders. i m a reasonable person, i am a libertarian, i believe an immigration reform but we got to secure the border. we can t make the mistake that ronald reagan made and put the cart before the horse. he did we ve done this before. we ve given amnesty and then they say they will give us border security and then didn t happen and it s been a grave mistake. dan: david, will the democrats oppose anything on immigration? i wonder, where is the compassion for the american taxpayer? we have people in this country who work very hard and a class of legal immigrants who work
memo to the department earlier this year, expressing deep concerns to deputy attorney general rod rosenstein about mueller s inquiry into alleged obstruction of justice by the president. despite this development, our own catherine herridge reports that rosenstein is still not expected to appear before house lawmakers this session. joining is never a reaction, author of the terrific book, te russian hoax, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett, along with attorney david davie and republican congressman bob goodlatte. gregg, i will go to first on this memo. you ve read it, i read it, it is a manifesto on how ridiculous it is to charge the president or even think about charging the president for obstruction of justice on what is essentially a personnel decision in the firing of jim comey. i find it incredible that democrats aren t celebrating this memo. your opinion? this is the document, a meticulously, well reasoned analysis of the law of
he talked about her being a liar because she supposedly said that we don t separate children. well, we don t. that is not the policy. the policies is to enforce the law and he knows this, this is pure liberal demagoguery and propaganda and their purpose is to demonize republicans as racist and heartless and it s shameless what they are doing. dan: emily, i don t know if you saw that but it was unbelievably disrespectful. the congressman, while dhs secretary nielsen was talking, gets up and leaves. david, you pointed out, really grotesque to watch. emily, from your perspective, being an attorney, this policy, the so-called separation of children policy, because is not a policy, it s actually a 2015 policy. it is 92 donald trump. we cannot hold these people in detention for more than 20 days. i don t understand what they arr suggesting. what are they suggesting? we detain them for more than 20
there s laws to protect it s decimated my community played by the way, the story of jesus, he died for our sins. he was born for oure sins. to go on the cross dan: he missed a few details. obviously he doesn t. the bible, only using it for his political agenda. dan: david, no better person to have on giving your book. i find incrediblyca disingenuous about this, not just the convenient use of religion, also the compassion angle he thinks he s trying to take, while he ignores the fact that the united states has been the most generous country on earth when it comes to legal immigrants. we just ask that you come here legally. it s entirelyth disingenuous. this is such demagoguery, dan. did you see the stunning disrespect he showed for secretary nielsen? dan: he walked out. liberals are supposed supposed to respect women. he called her. a liar and remorseless. he walked out right after she started talking.