They are engaging. The issue for us is our ability and they talk about it with the United States and the prc has, and that is the existing world power and how did you operate together and solve disputes in a peaceful manner under international norms. The indications that they are continuing to try to solve those in an aggressive way we would not agree with. Some with relation to the philippines are disconcerting, and we think that is the wrong way to go. There are other cases where they are engaged and things are handled in a more appropriate way. It is kind of a National Strategy with china, which i am not sure how you would answer what the true united National Strategy is with respect to this prc. There is a case where we are looking at both sides of that someenge, is that there is kind of movement in their territorial game. I will merge a number of questions together. One is a lot of bilateral engagements, and most of your answers were bilateral in their description. Theres probably
It clear that a particular practice is ok going on in the future. It means, well, this is what theyve done they have done, so were not going to go back and revisit it. Just like were not going to go back and take the cross out of every city seal thats been there since, you know, 1800. But it doesnt mean that it would be ok to adopt a seal today that would have a cross in it, does it . Not necessarily. But i think history is clearly important to the establishment clause analysis under this courts precedence in two it clear that a particular practice is ok going on in the future. It means, well, this is what theyve done they have done, significant respects, both of which apply here, one of which might not apply in your with respect to your hypothetical. The first being the history shows us that the practice of legislative prayer, just like the motto, has not, in fact, led to an establishment and, therefore, we can be confident it is not in danger of doing so. And secondly, the history of
Recognize the classic motown pop song. You dont have to worry. You already know the song but if you called me 30 years ago i may well have that before i decided to become an academic i try to be a rock star. I had a lot of fun. That is not where my strength glaves. I realized i could do better as an archaeologist and a late lead guitarist. Being a historian is a better way to answer the question and tonight i want to disagree. War what is it good for but it is the story over the last 10,000 years . To create Larger Societys for the ones that people live in . This is an important thing to say because of that is the case that understanding what war has been good for seems it is crucial to understanding what it might do with the 21st century if we want them to be safe we need to know what it has been good for in the past. The weapons are more destructive but yet the world is a safer place to live hidden. With a remarkable paradox that needs to be explained. The answers to the question is
Select committee. Were joined by mary troyan. Why did the speakers select trey gowdy . A congressman gaddy has been very vocal doubt gowdy has been a vocal critic about how the administration has handled the. Ttack but also congressman gowdy is a former prosecutor. He is known as one of the most tenacious interrogators on the hill, and it is that background that was important to the speaker. Vieww was his track record ed . He was a state prosecutor, and people in the upstate of South Carolina are calling him as a successful prosecutor. I talked to some people today. He handled a lot a big cases himself as a state prosecutor, does notcted person always have to do, and he won all of his cases. 1 on Death Penalty cases. Lindsey graham thinking trey gowdy is the right person at the right time. What does the rest of the South Carolina delegation think . A lot of them came in together including kim scott. They were elected at the same time in 2010. They are a closeknit bunch, i am talking ab
Best guesses. But of course the numbers that the indians had operated from a far smaller demographic base so, the impact of heavy losses is going to be much greater proportionately with indians. So the indians lost a great many warriors particularly but also women and children in starvation as a result of the war. And that made it all easier for americans after 1815 to remove some of these people, ship them further west so they ultimately end up on reservations in indian territory. This did facilitate american expansion across the continent. Then on top of that i suppose you can throw in property dam e damages a result of british raids, captures of sea merchants, men, things like that. Its probably impossible to put a precise figure on that. The british captured a few american merchants in the period, but actually americans also captured a good many british merchants. I think its impossible to put a figure on that. But if we say that human damage is necessary, the greatest any war in