Make those false statements does. I think it creates an uncomfortable system. I have some real concerns about how it is played out in some states. Host what kind of tax revenues has california garnered from medical marijuana and what are the early results from colorado . Guest colorado has been fascinating to watch. The last few months we have seen taxation results released and Advocacy Groups from the beginning were talking massive tax benefits in many states looking for additional source of revenue is very appealing. In some of the states the idea of Marijuana Legalization being a cure for problems sounded very appealing. The initial estimates most of us thought were too high. The tax revenues would not be nearly as high as the Advocacy Group had implied. The results came out in colorado and the tax revenues were much higher. Suddenly we were wrong in our understanding of this. If you look closely what happened in colorado in the early after when pot was made legal there wasnt suffic
You cant make any assumption that way but the curve of demand is not only so strongly upward it has me been reached that malfusian where it takes off yet. The canadians are desperate and the processors in canada are desperate for American Farmers to get the seed planted because how much the demand demand is going. At least in the foreseeable future i believe farmers will see profits growing seed oil and effect winds up stabilizing keep in mind a 100dollar profit is more than twice of what the average American Farmer is making on soy profit. Even if that stabilizes the Energy Independence i think hemp is here to stay and it is true that this is the new industry for the u. S. One of humanities longest utilize plants as an industry. Most industries fail. Most new industries fail. We cant guarantee this is going to be an automatic success but hemp is not new. The benefits of hemp i mean the persians call it the king of seeds. I dont want to lay the dash my own spiritualism on anyone else b
Ohio is pushing hard and texas just gave a talk at rice university. I shouldnt ask a price because the Baker Institute that brought mean, they get it. One of the reasons they get it in terms of drug policy is because there are a border state and they know what cannabis prohibition does visavis organize crime and write down from the ambassador to the namesake of the institute to all the researchers there are totally on board. I guess i should say to my surprise texas is ready on hemp. I actually think just as california is often paving the way for things that happen across the nation and across the west i think texas is going to be the reverberation across the midwest because thats an easier vote for in Illinois Republican cultivating it in texas. I think illinois will most likely follow missouri and ohio. I think they will be the first in the midwest. Its near a standard oil area and gary indiana. We are stuck in a horrible cycle. We have had their land since 1865 but the bank runs it
Briefly, what does the body of Scientific Evidence show regarding effect i haveness of met doen and buprenorphine in treatment of opioid abuse disorders . The research has shown, has shown it not just for methadone and buprenorphine, and naloxone, as part of a comprehensive program for treatment of opioid addiction are quite effective and significantly improve outcomes of individuals being able to stay on one hand ab stinent from the drug or to decrease likelihood of relapsing, also protects them against adverse outcome such as overdose. So in light of those studies you also said in your testimony that existing evidence based prevention and treatment strategies are highly underutilized across the United States, and last week we had an expert tell the panel that very few patients with opioid addiction today receive treatments that have been proven most effective. He was talking about the rapid detox, followed by abstinence based treatment. I wonder if you can help understand this. Why d
Treatment of opioid abuse disorders . The research has shown, has shown it not just for methadone and buprenorphine, and naloxone, as part of a comprehensive program for treatment of opioid addiction are quite effective and significantly improve outcomes of individuals being able to stay on one hand ab stinent from the drug or to decrease likelihood of relapsing, also protects them against adverse outcome such as overdose. So in light of those studies you also said in your testimony that existing evidence based prevention and treatment strategies are highly underutilized across the United States, and last week we had an expert tell the panel that very few patients with opioid addiction today receive treatments that have been proven most effective. He was talking about the rapid detox, followed by abstinence based treatment. I wonder if you can help understand this. Why do we have a situation where people are not getting evidence based treatment . It is a complex problem. There are many