At the outset i want to thank senator ron johnson and his staff for sponsoring the room for todays event. As you have may have noticed from your program and our panel up here were playing shorthanded this afternoon. Professor coup from Hofstra School of law [laughter] not sure what that was. Professor koo had a last minute conflict which precluded him from flying down this morning. Even without his valuable presence i think you will agree we have a great panel. And the topic of executive and legislative war powers seems particularly appropriate given we just celebrated our nations independence day. After more than 200 years, our government has develop ad track record regarding starting wars and use of military force which can be measured against the founders views and the constitution. It is good to ask, how has the framers understanding been followed, and in what ways has it been ignored . Do the founding principles regarding these topics still have application to our modern era . To
The Federalist Society last on thested a discussion constitutional war powers of congress and the president. Among those we will hear from is armor congressman Mickey Edwards who represented oklahoma and andrew mccarthy, former federal prosecutor who led the prosecutor against the blind world tradehe 1993 center bombing. This is about one hour and 20 minutes. 12 15. Y clock, it is im the deputy rector of the Federalist Society article one initiative dedicated to the development of a series of rolls and practical goals for congress that stem from core constitutional principles of thought todays luncheon is just one of many events the Federalist Society has planned here on capitol hill across the country. On behalf of the initiative, i want to thank you all for joining us. I would also like to thank senator ron johnson and his staff for sponsoring the room for todays event. As you may have noticed from your program and your panel appear, we are shorthanded. The hawthornefrom school of la
The fact that his own personal views politically never impacted the investigation. Now, its important to note, his attorney has just issued a letter that says that his client may actually not be able to answer a lot of the questions posed to him in public by these lawmakers today, especially on the russia probe. He does claim that he tried to meet with the fbi and lawmakers together with those attorneys to decide what topics would be off limits. But according to strzoks attorney, that never happened. Lets go live to manu raju. Outline for me what we have learned will be part of Peter Strzoks Opening Statement today. Well, he is going to defend his role in the clinton investigation, as well as the beginning part of the russia investigation and Mueller Investigation once these Text Messages did come to light. Hes going to say he did everything by the book when it came to the investigation, when it came to decisions not tos were cute Hillary Clinton. His own personal views had no impact w
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
We’ve all been there. Maybe we find it in reviewing the chain of title for trademarks during due diligence. Maybe it’s something that another company filed that has nothing to do with us. Or maybe someone on your team made a typo (yup, no one is perfect!). But, however it happened, it’s there, in the USPTO records: an assignment inadvertently recorded against a registration that was not actually part of the assignment; a security interest recorded against the wrong application number; or a name change was erroneously recorded as a merger. Regardless of why or what, the bottom line is the same: there is an error in the chain of title for the application or registration. Oops! Now what? How do we get that error fixed and removed from the USPTO trademark records?
3 thay đổi trong chiến lược chống dịch | Thời sự thanhnien.vn - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thanhnien.vn Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.