democrat party and its radicalism. the war on constitutional ism, on national sovereignty ocapitallism, classrooms and parents. almost an alien party if you will with its embrace of american marxism. there is other great threat we face because of its association and attachment to democrat party, i hate to say this, someone who spent part of his career a wonderful time at the department of justice as chief of staff. we have to fear federal law enforcement. in specific, the u.s. department of justice, and the fbi which is a piece of the department of justice. first, i want to make a recommendation to you, each american, each of you file a freedom of information act request with the department of justice and fbi for any information the government might be keeping on you. with all of these stories of big tech and fbi, working together. and the massive databases now and montherring that is taking place monitoring, you may not believe it many of you most of you are patriots. but
search was complete. nothing else to find. biden was at the scene of the crime this weekend. we don t know what he was doing or who he was meeting with. despite spending much of his presidency in delaware there it are no visitor logs at his home. they said his personal residence is personal. why was classified documents just lying around in a personal library? and a personal garage? why did the federal government allowed biden s partner lawyers to conduct the search a few months after raiding mar-a-lago and seizing documents at gun point. what prompted them to look for joe biden s classified documents in the first place? good question. with reaction the author of the price of principle alan dershowitz and gregg jarrett. professor, this is a personal residence but they believe he has prerogatives. what is their defense right now? well, i think the defense is going to be carelessness, sloppiness, no malev oinence. what about donald trump and hillary clinton? we will see a
government. a decade ago the new york times admitteded and they published a piece on the rise of domestic surveillance abuse which exploded. the patriot act became a short hand for government abuse in overreaching which inflicted collateral damage on political dissent and religious liberty. that s still true and still a tragedy. what is fascinating is that the new york times stopped acknowledging it. there was not a single mention of the 9-11 anniversary on the front page of yesterday s paper. the paper that purports to represent new york the epicenter of the 9-11 attack. why would the new york times ignore 9-11? a good question. because the new york times and the tiny leadership class it represents now endorses the nationwide crackdown on civil rights that 9-11 made possible. they benefit from it. it s how they keep power. so 9-11 was less a trag than an opportunities. if you don t believe that watch how joe biden commemorated that anniversary yesterday it s not
americans and their governmentm. a decade ago. the new york times admitted this. the times markedis the anniversary of 9/11 by publishinhed a piecg a piece on the rise of domestic surveillance abuses which explode after the 9/11 attacks. the patriot act, according to st the new york times, quote, govem quickly became a sort of shorthand for government abusenh and overreaching, which, quote, inflicted collateral damage on political dissent, religiousl liberty and the freedom of association, end quote. that is still true, in fact, truer than it s ever been,trage. and it is still a tragedy. what s fascinating is that stopd the new york times has stoppedi acknowledging it. in fact, remarkablity, there wae not a single mention oft page o the 9/11 anniversaryf yesterday. on the front page of yesterday s paper, the paper that purports to represent new york , the epicenter of the 9/11 attacks. now, why would the new york times ignore 9/11? ignore well, good question, be the new york
declining to answer more than 440 questions during a civil deposition in new york on wednesday. i will be joined by former national security advisor and u.n. ambassador john bolton to talk about the iranian plots to kill him and four other top trump national security officials and to get his reaction to the new legal troubles surrounding his former boss. and i will speak to chef and global humanitarian jose andres from ukraine to update the work by his non-profit to keep communities fed after more than five months of war. he met with president zelenskyy today. let s talk about the internal deliberations within the justice department. barbara, we understand that there are concerns inside the fbi and others that the fbi chief chris wray was so careful about the justice department guidance that he did not push back when he was in nebraska yesterday against the false claims by the president and others the fbi could have planted information there. yeah. that is a baseless piece