CBDT likely to get three new members by next week ANI | Updated: Mar 11, 2021 20:30 IST
By Shailesh Yadav
New Delhi [India], March 11 (ANI): The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), an apex body of the Income Tax Department, is likely to get new members by the next week.
Committee of Secretaries (CoS), on January 11, had shortlisted names for the CBDT members among 10 contenders. According to sources, after that meeting, CoS has shortlisted three names for the post of the members.
After that, it was sent to the DoPT for approval. If sources are to be believed then 1984 batch Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer Rashmi Saxena Sahni and 1985 batch IRS officers JB Mohapatra and Anuja Sarangi are going to be the next three new board members. They are amongst the most senior officers in the income tax department.
Aanbieders in verweer tegen suggestie vaccinatievoordringen
skipr.nl - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from skipr.nl Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
exonerate him. it s not in any of the documents, it s not in your appointment order, it s not in the special counsel regulations, it s not in the olc opinions, it s not in the justice manual and it s not in the criminal federal prosecution. those words are nowhere because it was not the special counsel s job to exclusively determine donald trump s innocence or to exonerate him because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence. it exists for everyone. everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents. and because there is a presumption of innocence, prosecutors never, ever need to conclusively determine it. now, director, the special counsel applied this inverted burden of proof that i can t find and you said doesn t exist anywhere in the department policies, and you used it to write a report. and the very first line of your report, the very first line of your report says as you read this morning, it authorize the
you also state in this opening statement that you threw overboard the word collusion because not a legal term. he would not conclude, because collusion was not a legal term. it depends on how you want to use the word. in the general parlance, people can think of it that way. but if you re talking about in the criminal statute arena, you cannot. because it s much more accurately described as conspiracy. are in your words, it s not a legal term so you didn t put in your collusion. correct i want to talk about your powers and authorities. the attorney general and the appointment order give you powers and authorities that reside with the attorney genera attorney general. the attorney general has no ability to keep powers and authority greater than the powers and authority of the attorney general. correct? i don t believe yeah, i think that is correct. mr. mueller, i want to focus on one word in your report. it s second to last word in the
general? yes. you also say you threw overboard the word collusion because it s not a legal term. you would not conclude because collusion was not a legal term? well, it depends how you want to use the word. in the general parlance, people can think of it that way. if you re talking about criminal statute arena, you can t, because some it s much more accurately described as conspiracy. right. your words are, it s not a legal term so you didn t put it in your conclusion, correct? that s correct. mr. mueller, i want to talk about your powers and authorities. the attorney general in the appointment order gave you powers and authorities that reside in the attorney general. the attorney general has no ability to give you powers and authority greater than the powers and authority of the attorney general, correct? i don t believe. yeah. i think that is correct. mr. mueller i want to focus
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.