They dont need any fuel for because they get from russia. Even if you wanted to make an argument that they need to have a domestic supply, they dont need of bombs worth of material for that. So i think that would be another component. I think there needs to be some limitations on the number of centrifuges. David albright on nonproliferation expert incentives among the more, most careful observers of the Iranian Program has suggested an upper limit of 10,001st generation iranian centrifuges. If they 10,000, first generation iranian centrifuges. You would have to reduce the number below that. And allows it on the enrichment aside it would be important for the iranians to we implement the Additional Protocol so that the International Inspectors associate with the iaea cannot only visit declared facilities but could visit other suspected facilities in iran to ensure that they are in compliance with the agreement and not taking a secret path towards the bomb. Which we know from the past act
We started with a waiver to cover individuals who are h. I. V. Positive with incomes below the federal poverty limit. This coverage was extended to individuals who are h. I. V. Positive with incomes 100 below the federal poverty limit. The key to maintaining control of the costs there was cost neutrality. The other piece of let me go back. How do i go back . Oh. We then also took the early option to cover childless adults up to 133 . I mentioned that. Effective july, 2010. We also then received another 1115 waiver which is funded through an allocation to cover adults up to 200 of the federal poverty limit. We have received another 1115 waiver which is funded through a dish allocation to cover adults up to 200 of the federal poverty limit. We have expanded, unlike most state who is have opted for the Medicaid Expansion, who are expecting to see a large influx of people into their Medicaid Program, we do expect to see more people enrolled because were doing a lot of outreach, but the lar
General provides one, the economy, two local communs where they may be located. It may be the largest employer in a particular city or county. The amount of community outreach. The amounts of donations and sponsorships. Carriers are not just big brick buildings filled up full of cash. They are filled up full or employees. They are full of very giving folks that add to the fabric of a particular state or their economy or even the national economy. So i bring i kind of carry all of that stuff around with me. When im making decisions and when im out meeting with carriers or agents or consumers and reminding, you know again, whatever the group is, how valuable the Insurance Industry is to a particular economy or state or local area. That isnt always the case with some regulators. With all the reforms that have been adopted and that are being implemented i think there is a concern within the industry of regulatory fatigue in the sense that the industry believes, and i think rightly so, that
It a boom coalition. I want them all out. If you had that i think people would punch it to a large extent. From my point of view the potentiality is there. I dont have the name, i dont have the way in which it comes together but there is a lot more togetherness with the right and left in certain areas and we think as we look at individual issues. We have one more question, grab your ipads that come up if they have read that may be are we publishing this . Publishing the responses . When it comes to the recession recovery and the federal government made matters worse, made matters better, didnt matter much either way. Bill, third party. I would like peters ideal candidate. I saw your cfo there are enough ideal ceos, real people, all of them, and we pick that person and an independent party needs a democrat to nominate someone to the left of Hillary Clinton, they need someone to nominate someone well to the right of our last two nominees and the leaders in the middle, and the thing that
That are still taking place. The issue has been settled. The epa does have the Authority Bill in. The Supreme Court has said so twice. That matter believe should now be put to rest. Given that fact the agency has decided properly in my view that it should act now to reduce Carbon Emissions improve the quality of our air protect the health of our people and is part of an effort to address Global Climate change. The United States Climate Change is not just environmental issue or an economic issue. Climate change also has very real implications for our National Security and those concerns must be an important part of any discussion that takes place. My hope, however, is that the primary focus will be on the substance of the proposed rule and not epa brought authority to promulgate. That being said, it is clear that the act as it now stands is an imperfect tool to address the unique challenges that Climate Change presents. Congressional action and leaders would be a preferable approach, bu