a lot of backlash against these particular rules. what we are focusing on is that the home office in particular has the power to demand that a company disables its encryption, its security if it believes that there is an issue of national security or harm to children. there is currently a process in which that has to be reviewed, a third party oversight process, an appeals process. while thatis process, an appeals process. while that is going on, the tech company doesn t have to do anything. this update wanted to get would have that. 0nce update wanted to get would have that. once the tech firm are served this notice that it has to do it, it would have to do it straight away, thatis would have to do it straight away, that is what apple is saying, if it is served such a notice, it will some people,. i don t know how seriously this will be taken. it is not something that will coming soon, certainly not something that will happen overnight. if you use facetime and ten won, it will not dis
Learn how payers are using computer algorithms and narrowly trained staff to deliberately slow down or sabotage payouts, and how providers can better approach t
the aggravating markets are just so overwhelming, the prosecution has a good chance of meeting its burden of beyond a reasonable doubt, just as it did in the guilt phase. and in either case, the appeals process kicks in? not only does the appeals process kick in, but it is even much more complicated in a death penalty case. you can expect death penalty appeals to last for decades. i mean, the statistics are that of all the people on federal death row, a tiny fraction of them are ever actually executed. i m talking a handful in the last several decades, so you re just not going to see statistically a lot of people put to death. that s because the appeals process is so robust. you have direct appeals and collateral attack and hab yous petitions. the likelihood of success on appeal is tiny but in the united states, the defendant is entitled to all of those appeals
write that donald trump again argues contrary to both logic and fact that he was exonerated by a jury that found that he sexually abused e. jean carroll. so they re saying this is just another effort to try to prolong his $5 million, and just prolong this whole process. it is a little bit confusing, because she had a trial, the jury found that he had sexually abused her in that department store, and had to famed her in comments he made later on about it, and awarded her about $5 million. but she has another defamation trial coming up against the former president as well. right. that s the first trial that she initially brought in 2019. she had written her book, trump had then been asked about it while he was president by reporters, saying that this woman said that you had raped her. that s when he made those first statements. that has been tied up because he was the president at the time he made those statements. it s now gone through an appeals process, it s back to this judge t