Figure good evening and welcome to the San Francisco board of appeals the presiding officer is board president commissioner president lazarus and joined by commissioner fung and commissioner honda commissioner wilson will be joining us later there is one absent on the board the board may overrule the board on appraisal to my right to deputy City Attorney that be provide advise and mr. Pacheco and im again and again the Board Director were joined by the board at the taebl tangle it the Zoning Administrator he is representing Planning Commission and participating and sitting to his right is the deputy City Attorney representing the department of Public Health and i saw mr. Duffy representing the be department of building inspection mr. Pacheco go over the guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. The board asks you turn off outline Electronic Device and the boards rules of presentation are appellants and permit holders each have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for re
Board at the taebl tangle it the Zoning Administrator he is representing Planning Commission and participating and sitting to his right is the deputy City Attorney representing the department of Public Health and i saw mr. Duffy representing the be department of building inspection mr. Pacheco go over the guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. The board asks you turn off outline Electronic Device and the boards rules of presentation are appellants and permit holders each have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttals people affiliated with the parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes arrest to assist the board in the i cannot preparation of the minutes he members are asked but to the required to submit a speaker card to board staff when coming up to the podium the board loss welcomes our comments and incisions there are Customer Satisfaction forms on the left hand of the podium if you have requests about the Board Hearing please speak to the sta
To appeal and had no knowledge were fritter he are homeowners would no intention of movgs any contradiction will effect us longterm this lead to a impose that the deck was cut in half the privacy issue is of uppermost importance were requesting the appeal window be reopened to allow us to express our concerns again, we didnt receive a notification in the department of building inspection and building we should have the right to appeal please fooks the right of privacy is legitimate and we wouldnt have been here today at the appropriate time weve resorted because this was the only option after learning that we missed the appeals window address the compromise reached between her and the owner weve called the Appeals Office which was wonderful but we didnt receive a notice of appeal we waited for the notice but it only explained the deck was decreased by half the jurisdiction appeal was not the way we would have preferred it. We can hear from the permit holder now. Good evening, commissio
The speaker pro tempore on this vote the yeas are 226. The nays are 196. The motion is not adopted. Is adopted. Without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. The question is on passage of the joint resolution. So many as are in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. The gentleman from north carolina. Mr. Price i ask for the yeas and nays. The speaker pro tempore the yeas and nays are requested. Those favoring a vote by the yeas and nays will rise. A sufficient number having arisen, the yeas and nays are ordered. Members will record their votes by electronic device. This is a fiveminute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc. , in cooperation with the United States house of representatives. Any use of the closedcaptioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u. S. House of representatives. ] the speaker pro tempore on this vot
All of these recommendations raise serious concerns about the way director mayorkas was overseeing the eb5 program and in turn should be considered as a qualifying factor to determine his fitness to be secondincommand in charge at the department of Homeland Security. To summarize, we know that the National Security staff and the department of Homeland Security conducted reviews of the Investor Visa Program that mr. Mayorkas has been overseeing since 2009. These reviews found that the program created a danger to National Security, including the threat of exploitation by spies, criminals, and other National Security threats. I and others have asked for more information about the potential National Security vulnerabilities in the program and we have received no answers. What we do know is that director mayorkas dramatically expanded a program that the administration, even d. H. S. , believes for a threat to National Security. And according to a draft report by the Inspector General, he di