means before day ten. i have no knowledge as to whether this occurred in this case or not. this confirms that there were indeed communications issues between horizon and the data centre at this time. however, it should have had no impact on data recorded locally within the branch, provided all operational processes are followed correctly. all historical data should have been sent back to the branch from the data centre as normal. i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs from the period to see whether there were any issues or any justification in the claim that this resulted in a apparent system losses of £3000, as claimed. those final words in that final sentence, i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs, do you consider that to be a fair and accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e mails? it accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e-mails?- have seen in those e-mails? it looks that wa , have seen in thos
justice system into disrepute, providing further strong reasons to allow the appeal underground two. was it in your experience unusual for the post office to offer a plea on the basis that the defendant had to accept that the horizon system was working perfectly? i believe it has happened, in this case as well, but normally the prosecution and defence barristers speak. normally, when you might have the two charges, theft and false accounting, you may get the answer, you are willing to please to false accounting, but not to theft, and instructions will be taken from the post office solicitors, and it is accepted, but i think that is the angle they went down round about that time with the issues regarding horizon. in down round about that time with the issues regarding horizon. issues regarding horizon. in your experience. issues regarding horizon. in your experience, where issues regarding horizon. in your experience, where their - experience, where their circumstances where the