that s been the virtue of higher ed, one of the many over the last generation or two, harvard or columbia or whether it s montclair state. and so we have to figure out where do we go from here in light of this decision. one very crucial paragraph, sentence from that majority opinion of chief judge roberts, chief justice roberts, is this. as we all agree and nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant s discussion of how race affected his or her life be it through discrimination, inspiration or otherwise. so the court is leaving the door open a crack to allow admissions officers to consider an applicant s personal situation including an applicant s personal situation grappling with the issue of race.
the last word. the court can render a decision, it cannot change what america stands for. america is an idea, an idea, unique in the world an idea of hope, of opportunity, of possibilities, of giving everyone a fair shot. we should never allow the country to walk away from the dream upon which it was founded. that opportunity is for everyone, not just a few, discrimination still exists in america. discrimination still exists in america. today s decision does not change that. president biden, the congressional black caucus questions its own legitimacy. is this a rogue court? this is not a normal court. that s our white house correspondent arlette saenz with a very good question the question. exactly. the key question. the president went on to elaborate on that a little bit more. we want to get into that with