a crime in court. there s a big distinction. i m glad you touched on that. susie wiles cooperating, why does that matter? i don t think she s necessarily a household name. but someone very close to the former president and it s critically important. it suggests there may be further wrongdoing that the prosecutor will either uncover or allege. the case where we already heard of the great reporting by cnn, we hear papers wrus willing and the former president coming up with some excuse, when i said plans, i didn t mean military plans. plans for some architecture project, something implausible scheme. what we ll find out is whether or not there were other instances where a military map or something else that a potential future trial jury could easily understand. there are some things about this whole question of documents that are hard to understand. i think everybody knows that you re not supposed to show military maps to people who
together, out of that environment comes healthy decision making. when you have nine people or 12 people or 20 people all from the same background, all from the same social situation, all from the same geography, that is the environment for unhealthy decision making. and that virtue must flow through the entirety of life whether it s colleges, whether it s law schools, whether it s law firms, whether it s the executive branch of the u.s. government, whether it s the white house, the west wing, those of us of my generation certainly know the virtue of diversity and we have to continue on that path. i think it s vital to who we are as a nation, who we are as a people, that we continue to try to struggle along this path. president biden calling the court not normal. i think he went on to explain what he meant in overturning precedent and moving as fast as they have, former president obama was not subtle, and i
to dobbs and there is a significant shift in the court s jurisprudence. the not similar to dobbs. this is in line with public opinion. we can show the polling here because it s pew and 50% of americans disapprove of affirmative action. 33% approve. there is a split, though, along racial lines, i should note. sure. even in california voters have twice rejected racial preference nine states actually. right. i think democrats need to be a little bit careful on the political side in terms of saying this is an extension of the dobbs decision. i think as a political matter the court is not out on a limb at all in the way it was the last time around. to the extent that you have justice roberts and justices kavanaugh and barrett toward the middle of the court trying to chart a course that will be less politically contentious than with dobbs, i think this decision fits perfectly well within that, an area the court can shift policy without running afoul of public opinion. errol, i th
it s the court. this is it. you re seeing the rulings reflect that. we want to talk about those rulings. you think first it was abortion rights last year. it was also gun laws to some degree and now the supreme court has gutted affirmative action in college admissions declaring race cannot be an express factor in picking students. it s the latest sweeping change ushered in by a conservative super majority as poppy was noting, that is reshaping america as we know it, very in line with what conservative legal scholars have been pushing for for years. the historic landmark ruling could have lasting effects on the university campuses across the nation. the class entering this fall will be the last affirmative action class. it was this time last year that the supreme court overturned roe vs. wade. one year later most abortions are banned in 14 states. some don t allow any exceptions for rape or incest. the supreme court with a landmark ruling on the second amendment and guns, a huge
of executive order on any of this, all of the interest groups that have been behind legislation like this and other litigants will certainly challenge them in court. they re not reluctant. not reluctant. which is to some degree why they ve built to this point. you re going to speak to the education secretary miguel cardona later on in the show. what can and what will the administration do now? i feel we ve gone through the cycle ar the administration is furious after a ruling and then comes out and says we ll do x, y and z and six to eight months later you have a couple of executive actions, not even executive orders. there s not a lot they can do but they feel they have to say something. we ll go through the process again to some degree. we ll ask the secretary of education. a top trump campaign aide meeting numerous times with investigators as part of the special counsel s classified documents probe.