and overnighting at his home up there but the comments from the new york governors and mayor are funny. and a reminder how his anning to onnists from new york have been key from new york. jerry nadler and eliot engel is from new york. and nita lowey who oversees appropriation, that wall that he wants so much and chuck schumer is from new york. many more antagonists than more ways than one. can you imagine life for him if he was in new york after leaving the presidency in this extremely liberal town? in addition to the anning to onnists in congress there are millions of new yorkers that don t like donald trump. the vast majority of new yorkers doan like donald trump. that is not something he s comfortable with or lived through and that is in your face way so it is not a surprise to
was support among syrian antagonists of that regime and the regime of bashar al assad. it would prove a lot of people who had opinions about where al baghdadi was totally wrong. matt bradley, in beirut for us. he is mentioning the border with turkey. now to richard. you have been checking with sources who have some sense of what happened there last night. what are you hearing from the ground there of what happened and what that site looks like today? reporter: so i know this area. i ve crossed through this border region a half dozen times or so. it is a smuggling town. it is a place where people go if they want to get into turkey or come from turkey illegally. it is a place that isis itself has used many, many times. it goes back even before isis where people were smuggling
process applies to congressional investigations. that includes congressional impeachment inquiries. shannon: i want to read something that s a caution coming from spectator.org. trump will win and 2020 because of impeachment. they talk about what happens after. think about the rallies he will have the van. he will repeatedly remind his supporters that after two partisan witch hunts taken by antagonists, he is standing and ready to take on any challenge or the democrat nominates. how does that play in 2020? i totally disagree and history is a great precedent for that. george bush won back in the year 2,000 after the republicans went through their witch hunt against bill clinton wear white water didn t anything. a one-word lie under oath is what they based their vote on and the house of representatives. i don t agree with that assessment not all. i would like to add in this
to constitutional principle of due process and the supreme court has the due process applies to congressional investigations including congressional impeachment inquiries. shannon: a caution from spectator.org under their headline trump will win in 2020 because of impeachment, they talk about what will happen after the house impeaches them in the senate is not remove them, think about the rallies going to have, trump repeatedly reminded supporters that after two partisan witchhunts perpetrated by unscrupulous antagonists with little regard for evidence or ethics you still standing and ready to take on any challenge or the democrats nominate. how does that play in 2020? i totally disagree, history is a great president, george bush won in 2000 after the republicans went through their witchhunt against bill clinton where whitewater didn t reveal anything. a one word lie under oath is what they base their vote on in the house of representatives so i don t agree with that at all. but i wo
reporter about secretary perry is what was his intent when he interacted with ukrainian officials about natural gas in ukraine. we know based on our reporting that rudy giuliani had his own ideas about how different oil companies should be set up and natural gas companies should be set up in ukraine was talking to the president, was talking to ukrainian friends of his, business associates. but secretary perry as a secretary of energy overlapped at times with some of these conversations. the question congress will ask him is was his intent to meddle in ukrainian politics and business for political reasons or did he have the intent to do so simply as energy secretary? in the previous block i talked about how a bunch of people who thought that the administration might be able to put behind the stone wall or people who were seen as loyalists to trump have in a rapid fire of succession over the course of the last week got on the other side of the stone wall and have turned out to be antag