Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Plus, first, the elite still dont get it. That is the focus of tonights angle. Over the weekend, the libertarianleaning coke network hosted a Rocky Mountain retreatd political leaders. They use the occasion not to amplify and hear the president s policies, but to decry them. 82yearold charles koch has taken the reins of the network. He released this video in advance of the retreat. Now he claims opportunities in the global marketplace are creating anxiety and the loss of jobs at home. In response, we are seeing the rise in protectionists, for countries, organizations, and individuals are trying to protect themselves from these changes. They are doing whatever they can to close themselves off from the new, hold onto the past, and
facilitating the outsourcing of jobs, even through really lame policies, like regulation, or through poorly nego
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Policies, like regulation, or through poorly negotiated trade deals. Dont get me wrong. Ot the kochs have done great work on tax reform, stuffff like deregulation, and also in the area of education. Last year, they spent 90 million in university programs, and they are committed to expanding their support for k12 education. I have a question for you. How effective other educationn efforts be if americans enter a world where china dominates most Major Industries . Including the areas of stem science, technology, so forth including things like artificial intelligence. Ud we cant just look the other way while china and a lot of other countries, by the way, game the Global Trading system and rack up huge trade surpluses. I. T. , stem, unfair subsidies and so forth. Any fairminded person would
have to agree with what the white house Economic Adv
impeachment. mmm-hmm. and he didn t want to come out and say it, but yeah. there is no other explanation. also you talked about the exchange on obstruction. there was also the collusion versus conspiracy exchange that happened with georgia republican doug collins. let s watch it. collusion and conspiracy are essentially synonymous terms, correct? no. if no, on page 180 of volume i of your report, you wrote as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as that crime is set forth in a general statute. are you sitting here testifying something different than what your report states? i i leave it with the report. there was rapid fire, like yeah. but so what that was i think was trying to save the last of the big three because right off the bat we lost no obstruction, right? i think the first answer mueller gave all day was false. second question was total and
also you talked about the exchange on obstruction. there was also the collusion versus conspiracy exchange that happened with georgia republican doug collins. let s watch it. collusion and conspiracy are essentially synonymous terms, correct? no. if no, on page 180 of volume 1 of your report, you wrote as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute. are you sitting here testifying something different than what your report states? i i leave it with the report. there was rapid fire, like yeah. but so what that was i think was trying to save the last of the big three because right off the bat we lost no obstruction, right? i think the first answer mueller gave all day was false. second question was total and complete exoneration. should they have just stopped at nadler? honestly, we were saying if they had said we rest, that s it.
should that be asked? yes, i think they should ask that. i think he will say i never reached that question because of the doj policy. but then you ask did you find substantial evidence that he obstructed justice? he said yes in the report. if president trump was an ordinary citizen would he have been charged with obstruction? what s the answer mueller will give? i think mueller will say i never reached that question because of the policy. the counter is did you find substantial evidence of obstruction? that s in his report also. he has to say yes to that. carl bernstein, did you intend for congress to act on the findings of your report? i mean, that s a key question. remember, there s a footnote in the report that cited the constitution s impeachment clauses. wait and see. that s one of the big questions, and we don t know the answer. and it s going to determine part of his whole attitude of the hearing, whether he s willing to embrace and answer a question such as that or is