relationship with the u.s. is deteriorating in a way that they don t really have control over. so they are really trying to regain control of the conversations, really make their voices we heard. perhaps ahead of what s reported tosh an upcoming meeting between trump and putin in july. they want to help set the agenda for that. perhaps as brian is suggesting in this piece, the chaos in washington plays well domestically here, a more calmer and congressional fight, it gives them the confidence to come out noud and speak his mind as he did there. but certainly, nothing really new. we knew the kremlin has always denied any allegations of intervention in the u.s. election or collusion with the trump team. but the delivery was certainly more vehement, more frank and more descriptive in some parts than we ve seen in recent weeks an months. well, the president did refuse to criticize his u.s.
noud once again. but that person would be picked by a three judge panel and completely insulated from any kind of political tampering. i know nixon still fired archibald cox, but they were forced to replace another special prosecutor. it s not perfect, but a hell of a lot better than a special counsel. do you think there is any chance you could get legislation from republicans to effectively police the president? well, i think it will be tough because some people are defending this decision. but i believe it s something we got to do. bottom line here is public confidence. and if the administration doesn t have anything to hide, they ought to be helping with this because otherwise this issue will dog them for years and it will just keep being a dark cloud over whatever they do. they should be cooperateding. so i m going to urge my republican colleagues to join some kind of effort to create a special prosecutor position because as i say, otherwise it just keeps going on. now, i had a f
suspending the training in arizona for however months, and what were the reasons for it? but the core of it, and the real core of it is medical ability comes down to who is responsibility is it to tell the airline? if he went to see a private doctor about any of the problems, the doctor is confidentially bound not to reveal it. that is the problem here. how could lufthansa have known, and should they have known? should he have told? well sh, he had a duty to. and he could have lost his job. he had a legal duty not to fly, and that is a given sdlchlt and as we discuss it more and we learn more about andreas lubitz, will ripley saw the man on a consistent basis, and he joins us from dusseldorf, and now the investigators are trying to find the motive of the terrible act, and what can you tell us about the terrible drirection they ar head noud? well, we know that at least for the time being this
do you know him? i traded him a piece of cake. i don t even talk to him. inmates often trade food. the small dessert is one of the more popular items. harvey chose the wrong person to trade with. i believe there was urine at the bottom. most cake is dry, not very moist like that at the bottom. so i believe there was urine. i know something wasn t right with the cake. i said, you know, i think i have to do something about this. i think mr. gill is possibly a little pair noud paranoid. every meal i was told as soon
inmates often trade food. the small dessert is one of the more popular items. harvey chose the wrong person to trade with. i believe there was urine at the bottom. most cake is dry, not very moist like that at the bottom. so i believe there was urine. i know something wasn t right with the cake. i said, you know, i think i have to do something about this. i think mr. gill is possibly a little pair noud that as soon as he receives his carton of his drink, he throws it in the trash. see how hard it is to open that?