aid turned back on. the aid was turned back on because the united states senatorsy telling the president let s turn the aid back on and do. this nothings that changed the fundamental facts. the one thing that is clear, the one thing that is clear is this is based on some anonymous whistleblower. and there are 435 members of congress and only one member knows who that whistleblower is. and just as importantly, who the people are who formed the basis of that whistleblower s complaint. these handful of people that the whistleblower identified in his complaint. that individual is adam schiff. how is that fair? that only adam schiff know how this whole thing started. and the other members of congress don t know that. this is something we need to get to the bottom of and know how this whole thing started and why adam schiff is the only one who has that information. steve: that s one of the reasons why the president says adam schiff should be impeached. ainsley: his tweet last night. steve: j
but what they did the other day, this was not some march on washington. this was a bunch following the orders of the person to whom they have the greatest allegiance, not their constituents, not the constitution, their greatest allegiance to a lawless president and they are going to pay a very heavy price, a long view of history will not treat them well. i m curious to see what congressman matt gaetz your colleague on the other side of the aisle who led that charge has to say to me. i want to be clear, you re saying you think it is realistic to hold public hearings by mid-november if not sooner, am i understanding that correctly? that s my personal view and advocating for. okay. republican lawmakers are also sending this letter to chairman adam schiff of the intel committee talking about the whistleblower. this anonymous whistleblower who initially started this impeachment inquiry or triggered it at least, saying we re surprised by your announcement that the committees will not r
until they have a vote they are not going to comply. ainsley: we are learning more about the whistleblower. the washington examiner has an article written bye bye ron york. the whistleblower has professional ties to 2020 candidate. it talks about this letter written by the ig, the inspector general for the intelligence community michael attkisson who did testify in front of congress the other day. the letter was written on august 26th, and it said the anonymous whistleblower who set off the trump-ukraine impeachment fight showed there was arguable political bias in favor of a rival political candidate. steve: right. brian: for some reason that was barely brought up when the acting d& acting dni. this woman seems credible. new york times says it s a guy. no one talked about the fact that there is political affiliation. byron york says yeah. i think he is working for the candidates. here is an excerpt byron york all three sources says attkisson did not identify the candidate with who
functions of congress, they co-equal branch of government. you think about what the democrats are trying to do, impeach the president of the united states, 13 months prior to an election based on an anonymous whistleblower who has a bias against the president. the guy running the process, chairman schiff, didn t even tell us he met with the whistleblower prior to the whistleblower filing the complaint. dana: a couple hours ago, democratic head of the three house committees put out statement saying they would issue a subpoena for the ambassador and whatever documents he has. get to our political panel, matt and michael meehan, president and c.e.o. of sq communications. good to have you both here. i want to read a tweet, president trump wrote this. i would love to send ambassador sondland to testify, but unfortunately, he would be testifying before a compromised kangaroo court where republicans
investigating. this kid who has taken down millions for years and has a drug problem and failed out of the navy because he has a drug problem and got in the navy at 43 years old, to do that, give me a break. the question you are still a prosecutor. will somebody investigate it? listen for one second. here is the difference. we have an anonymous whistleblower who says donald trump did something wrong. donald trump says i didn t do anything wrong. we have the transcript of the call. before you interrupt me i know you want it is pathetic. listen to me just listen to me. hunter biden says i didn t do anything wrong, no