real quickly, how much longer do officials in washington anticipate that this whistleblower will remain anonymous? i m going to give what you sources have told me, not for long. now, that said, the problem is you don t want to make it so difficult because you want people to be able to come forward. steve: 100 percent. if they have a legitimate complaint. we don t know the answer to that but clearly in washington and given this environment, it sun like delay person will remain anonymous for long. brian: kevin, do you know why? i think they want to have some company he or she wants to have some company as a whistleblower. because they say other people heard it. it was he or she that came forward that would lengthen the investigation even more which democrats seem to want. it s going to be an exciting day, kevin. you bet. and, of course, once again the narrative is what they are after here. they want to keep that drum beat going if there is are ever goings to be chance for impeach
china. additionally i demand trans (if i have democrats. they went there and they wanted to force the new president to do things that they wanted under the form of political threat. they threatened him if didn t do things. that s what they are threatening me of but i didn t threaten anybody. brian: two things, one my conversation. if you want to see my first conversation, you can take a look at that let s forget and put aside how the country is less safe because now we now have a precedent of the president exposing private conversations between world leaders. let s put that aside for a second. look at the fact what s going to be happening today. this whistleblower evidently put his complaint in writing or her complaint in writing and last night they were able to go to a scif for lawmakers and read it and not supposed to talk about it. but in the new york times they talked about it. the whistleblower identified multiple white house officials who witnessed potential presidential
ukraine. did you see that? and what about the quid pro quo? if you don t investigate joe biden we re not going to give you the money. where was that part. ainsley: money was never mentioned if you read the conversation. the president is saying this is important if that s possible. basically will you look into this. if that s possible. he wasn t saying you need to do this. you have to do this and if you don t i won t give you the money. brian: right. so you see what you got. the other thing is the more scrutiny that goes over, this the more scrutiny the president is going to keep deflecting over and others will examine. we think eventually what the role of hunter biden was. after all 37 years old with no international business experience. why was he asked to be on the board of the ukraine in a country that was known for its corruption and was actually on its heels after the invation by the russians. ainsley: very limited expertise. brian: you wonder is this about trump or biden? steve:
complaint, which has just been declassified. ainsley: okay. kevin corke joins us live from the white house as president trump is calling for transparency. yesterday during the day the telephone conversation was released. it was declassified. and now the whistleblower complaint. something totally different, right, kevin? yeah. that s exactly right. remember, we don t know who the whistleblower is and it has been suggested, as you probably know this whistleblower is a partisan. now for the president s part, he is frankly laid this whole thing out in six words. no pressure, no quid pro quo. so, we heard him sort of reiterate that message yesterday in new york at the u.n. the transcript, he said, proved it. it was backed up yesterday by the ukraine president himself. we h i think, good phone call. it was normal. we spoke about many things and so i think and you read it, that nobody push it. in other words, no pressure.
much. brian: congressman jordan, have you senile a lot of this play out before. and have you seen it blow up in a lot of their faces. today it s going to be interesting. the director of national intelligence will be there. is he acting admiral. they already got one story wrong when they said that he said if you don t let me speak the way i want to, i m going to quit. he said i have never quit anything in my life. so, game plan this out. if you are a republican on that committee, what question do you have? well, i think the key is for us all to step back, brian, and remember what this is. go back to 2016. this fbi was so out to get the president, they spied on two american citizens associated with the presidential campaign. and we mark and i say this all the time but we should never forget what chuck schumer told us was going to happen. we are thinking about this so-called whistleblower. which you chuck schumer told us clear back he previewed all of this back on january 23rd, 2017.