learn quite a bit about internet private, but we also understand that we re not perfect, and so we want to take comments about how i to implement a do not track mechanism and, you know, when we should insure that there s privacy by design. and so it s a good practice, and it s one that helps us insure that we get the best information from the folks who are really involved in the day-to-day workings of the industry. host: well, this report has just come out, so what happens next? does it go to congress, does it go to the full ftc board? what happens? guest: well, we have sent it up to congress, of course, and there s been a lot of it s really resonated, as i think you guys know. and it has gone up to the ftc board. the commissioners, we voted 5-0. we re a very consensus-driven organization to release the report and move forward, and i think that s something we re all proud of, this pragmatic approach to people s problems and privacy issues this particular. so we ll refin
liberal agenda or a conservative agenda. he went to serve the people of pennsylvania, just like he s served his country for the last three decades. [applause] this is somebody who s always working for you; whose door is always open; who s helped pass 10 pieces of legislation in just three years - the first new federal funding for autism treatment in 12 years; student loan assistance for u.s. troops called to active duty; support for troops who come home with ptsd; more help and more contracts for pennsylvania s small businesses. [applause] he has been doing the work. in washington, you know, they make the distinction between show horses and work horses. and joe is a work horse. [applause] he s been working, not talking. [applause] and this is somebody who s been pragmatic. he will work with democrats, he ll work with republicans, he ll work with independents. he s willing to work with anybody who s interested in actually getting the job done, and that s the kind of person you
host: it allows illegal immigrants who served in the military. senators will also take up the issue of don t ask don t tell later in the week. go to c-span.org to find out more about our coverage. we want to get your thoughts on the epa proposed smog will s. rules. the epa says that it could save 12,000 lives per year and save money by reducing spending. what do you think this morning? it is a return to weigh in on the topic. if you are for it, 202-737-0001. if you are opposed, 202-737- 0002. here is the story from the wall street journal. host: next to this story is a chart this morning, showing that if you look at 2006 and 2008 bear quality levels, but the counties that had ozone monitors, roughly 96% would violate the most stringent standards, what the epa is looking to do on this issue. do you support this idea? if you do, 202-737-0001. are you opposed? if you are, 202-737-0002. you can also discuss on our twitter page, twitter.com/c- spanwj. you can also send us an e