The mail from cpmc, the testimony that i think today, indicates that basic passive stance of key city departments in trying to come up with innovative and creative programs, and let me just give you three. One, the city has no real experience in dealing with permanent entry level jobs in not in construction, but permanent jobs. And the notion that it is only healthcare in a hospital, and an organization is complex as cpmc, indicates to us that the folks doing job placement do not really know what they are dealing with in cpmc and there is no real engagement with the community in that regard. In terms of the innovative programs around providing healthcare and funding in the tender loin, there has been basically no engagement with the community and the Community Groups who were made up of those people who need those healthcare needs and finally saint lukes itself, redesigning saint lukes and creating a new and vigorous saint lukes, it is nowhere, and you will hear the testimony today in
To the coalition of san franciscans for healthcare, and housing, and jobs, and justice. And made up of some 60 Community Based organizations and coalitions of organizations. To meet the three main, if you will objectives, of our program for this development, the first is following up on the innovative solutions, that this board and cpmc came to end of the Development Agreement, around Employment Training and placement, and around healthcare and around the creation of a new saint lukes hospital. And our difficulty is in meeting those three objectives, the role of city departments has been extraordinary passive, basically waiting for checks in the mail from cpmc, the testimony that i think today, indicates that basic passive stance of key city departments in trying to come up with innovative and creative programs, and let me just give you three. One, the city has no real experience in dealing with permanent entry level jobs in not in construction, but permanent jobs. And the notion that
Cathedral hill but also the tender loin residents are included in the planning for the various impacts of the project. How are we doing through the planning . They are related to various invier mental impacts and so there is no specific out reach for that and perhaps we will recognize the approval that were required for sort of Community Visioning groups, to be established relative to the various campuses. And those are, the Planning Department are not involved in those, and it was required that the cpc was responsible for establishing those and they have not begun those, as far as i am aware but they are not required to establish those yet. And then, which department over sees to make sure that they are going to engage the neighborhoods in that visioning process, which department is over that . It will be the Planning Department, since it is a condition of approval. So we will machine that in the same way that we will regulate any other for compliance. And from the Development Agreeme