Rentals and people staying for short periods of time but over the course of a year occupying precious space for a long term tenant im proposing a cap of 90 days so it person can have an option to have a shortterm rental that adds up to 90 days or a permanent tenant and rules in place for people that want to go into the Hotel Business or the bedandbreakfast business to apply for a cu to have people stay longer than than the shortterm rentals that have past 90 days the option is still vail with a 90 day cap we have the Planning Department Ann Marie Rogers who is here to talk about how we currently apply the cu for folks who want to have a bedandbreakfast type of business in their home how often we actually approve and what are the rare instances we dont sea the types of conditions where the Planning Department didnt approve the cued. Thank you skoopz Planning Department currently before the Residential District other than the rh1 d you can seek the authorizations to become a hotel this i
This is not currently occupied so the price is going to start at market rate were getting 6 units when it is actually 3 but those wonderful units the department gives the excuse those are bigger and better for families those are only excuses to allow the existing Affordable Housing to be demolished and to allow the profits for the developers those excised are not policy and if you think about those excuses carefully what youre going to see this is also the can i nobody tears down samuel affordable units to build smaller nobody tears down small affordable units to build with less decency that t this is going to happen if you allow those flimsy excuses not found in the policy or the housing elements if you allow those flimsy you excuses to somewhat our your supporting a excuse that didnt exist and an exemption that will completely and utterly swallow the rule its been xhoovent or inconsistent the long term retention of sound ooblth affordability rent control heirs as it states in the pol
With the objectives one, 2 and 4 that really promote the preservation of the existing Affordable Housing stock in our city as well with that, ill say that the residents who are in support of the appeal i feel theyre raising significant and important concerns about the loss of this Affordable Housing and whether a project like this t is fittings within our mayors directives and so ill look forward to the testimony from both sides but i have those concerns of the loss and dont guess of the sound rent control housing in our city with that, thank you supervisor mar the appellant mr. Wimdz. Thank you president chiu Steve Williams on behalf of the appellants in this case and the surrounding Property Owners and residents thank you supervisor mar so far that introduction and that is the focus of our appeal so those concerns around housing were here to challenge the Planning Department conditional use authorization for the dont guess of a building on the corner of 26th avenue and clemente stree
One time i had five lists and came up with 38 of the commissions. So that is the number i was working with, we did 32 out of 38, but i appreciate that some change is happening there, too. Thank you very much. Great. And also, i would just like to make a comment, just for clarity. For example, the mayors list that provides the attendance and lists the names and numbers of days that they might have attended out of the total number of meetings. I think the difference and why i like or i guess would prefer the department of elections list because threbase they base it on the specific meeting and who the representative is appointed by. For the department of elections there is a board of supervisors appointmentment. So the first thing i want to know have they attended the meetings and do they have excused or unexcused absences . And their comments . And things that they have said in the minutes to determine are they providing good feedback and doing a good job as a member of a particular com
With that, thank you supervisor mar the appellant mr. Wimdz. Thank you president chiu Steve Williams on behalf of the appellants in this case and the surrounding Property Owners and residents thank you supervisor mar so far that introduction and that is the focus of our appeal so those concerns around housing were here to challenge the Planning Department conditional use authorization for the dont guess of a building on the corner of 26th avenue and clemente street that has is two Affordable Housing the subject site in the outer commercial district and the subject lot is one of two development lots on that particular block that is sdoebd within the commercial district if i could have the overhead heres the lot here it is just captured by the neighborhood commercial district the rest of the block is zoned residential Planning Department approval the conditional use authorization demolish those at a supplied vote of three to four with commissioner wu and commissioner moore voting against