Services and also to conduct a very important outreach which we have talked about being very important. In our cases advocating for the 2015, 16 budget to increase each of the specialists currently funded from 32 hours to 40 or whatever fulltime is in their Respective Agency and to ensure those other two districts that were not assigned somebody would also have access to a worker so that would be two different agencies. The project costs that we roughly calculated is 229,927. Good morning commissioners, my name is karen garison. Im here today to talk about Case Management and services here in San Francisco. Many agencies struggle with the ability to recruit and retain qualified case managers with limited contract dollars provided by dos and their own fund raising efforts. Agentcyies are competing against county funded positions that are paid at a much higher rate. Along with the stringent hiring requirements it has become increasingly difficult to identify and employ qualified candidat
[applause] were just doing whatever were going to do here this morning. Lets get a picture. [applause] thank you very much. The next item on the agenda is the Advisory Council report. Good morning commissioners, im filling in for president schmidt. The Advisor Committee didnt meet in december and will be reconvening on january 21. The next item on the agenda is the joint legislative committee report. We did not meet in december so in february well have a full report long term coordinating council report. The long term coordinating council didnt meet in december. Our next meeting is tomorrow afternoon. Thank you. Youre making this meeting very efficient. [laughter] next item on the agenda is the tack report. Kathy russo. Good evening, tack did meet in december. [laughter] well what we came out with was in 2015 we are going to have a white house conference on ageing. This should be a year for celebration, its the 80th anniversary of the Social Security act and the 50th anniversary of the
Once we get something set. Not necessarily laughter . I was just saying like the small bloomberg sign outside the door but if bloomberg minded their name on the outside of the pier 53 we should charge of theyre not a tenant. Like having on major buildings put their name on the top of building they pay a fee for that. As dan alluded to theres corecollections to the amount of space look at the amount of space they occupy. I think were him or her one the issues we have being waterborne tours most of the piers are transit shut theyre not putting in the back, if you will, it will behove us to have no more identification from the waterside were explorer that the only tenant is pier 72 hour 39 through the use of flags in the back thats on the docket were not as evolved in our thinking as you are. I had is a a couple of specific questions that occurred to me i appreciate the effort to standard device this i know its easier for the guidelines for staff and the tenants this is also a hot bottom
Meeting is adjourned. Present. At this time im going to turn the meeting over to my Vice President because i have asthma and i think he can carry through. Thank you. Thank you. Richard, would you announce some changes to the treatment of the agenda, please . If you all look at page three on the agenda please note that Vice President seriina will not be calling the agenda items in that order. Thank you. The items will be called in the following order item e, item i item j item f item h and item g. With that modification i ask for a vote to approve the agenda. Approve. Seconded. All in favor, any opposed. Thank you, the motion carries. I would like to also make a slight change in the agenda and move the Employee Recognition of after my report if thats possible. Absolutely. Any objection to changing the agenda . Thank you. Item number 3 approval of a consent agenda. So moved. Second. Thank you. Any discussions . Any comments from the public . All in favor . I. Any opposed . Thank you, the
Local 21. I am try to keep this brief. Im the union rep for project managers, housing specialists, contract compliance officers, engineers, all the folks you see before you who help make these redevelopment projects possible, and as you know since 2012 its been a very difficult time for the former agency. Both local 21 and seiu have been in difficult discussions with the city and county of San Francisco and ocii. The good news is that in november proposition d passed. And that granted former redevelopment employees city benefits and the majority of voters in San Francisco supported that, so this is kind of representing a turning point in Union Management and relations, and its given clarification to all of the uncertainty created by the state when they eliminated redevelopment so were working with the city and county on a transition of employment for our members who want to continue to work on redevelopment projects but as employees of the city and not ocii employees. However, under pr