means before day ten. i have no knowledge as to whether this occurred in this case or not. this confirms that there were indeed communications issues between horizon and the data centre at this time. however, it should have had no impact on data recorded locally within the branch, provided all operational processes are followed correctly. all historical data should have been sent back to the branch from the data centre as normal. i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs from the period to see whether there were any issues or any justification in the claim that this resulted in a apparent system losses of £3000, as claimed. those final words in that final sentence, i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs, do you consider that to be a fair and accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e mails? it accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e-mails?- have seen in those e-mails? it looks that wa , have seen in thos
Hundreds of innocent Post Office staff were wrongly convicted due to Horizon software failures. Post Office investigator Stephen Bradshaw is explaining his part in the injustice
In evidence to the Post Office Inquiry, Stephen Bradshaw was confronted with claims of bullying and forced to deny his team acted like 'Mafia gangsters' towards innocent postmasters
sefton and anne nield. they were post office clerks in liverpool and they were convicted of false accounting and given custodial prison sentences, suspended. now, the reason why they were focusing on these cases is because stephen bradshaw was the investigator of these two women s involvement in what was alleged to be false accounting. they were convicted of false accounting. and their convictions were overturned in 2021. and at the court of appeal, the post office accepted that the prosecution of these two women had been unfair and an affront to justice, and the post office admitted that they had failed to carry out a proper investigation, and that evidence
bugs, errors or defects in horizon? as i say. not bugs, errors or defects in horizon? as i say, not in this case. this case as i say, not in this case. this case was as i say, not in this case. this case was purely as i say, not in this case. this case was purely that - as i say, not in this case. this case was purely that they - as i say, not in this case. this. case was purely that they didn t credit case was purely that they didn t credit someone s case was purely that they didn t credit someone s deposit. - case was purely that they didn t credit someone s deposit. you i case was purely that they didn t i credit someone s deposit. you as case was purely that they didn t - credit someone s deposit. you as an individual. credit someone s deposit. you as an individual. me credit someone s deposit. you as an individual. me as credit someone s deposit. you as an individual, me as a credit someone s deposit. you as an individual, me as a business - credit someone s deposi