Andrew Young John News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Original is on that is sometimes good. It is not the idea that you lose history and constitutional interpretation. But original is on is the claim that the only legitimate way to read the constitution is what people in 1787 that wrote the document were people that ratified it thereafter thought what the constitution meant and that no other meetings are acceptable. And so i think for that the people the sense of how difficult it was even at the moment for people to understand what the constitution was, and at that moment, will be a little bit complicated. Coming back to my original question about madison who oftentimes thought he was bowed father of politicians. If you look at what he did in terms of trying to change them a little bit to reflect his evolving views, is it fair to think of them . Is the father of the constitution . The thing i came away from his how important this is. Not the objective record but as a way for us to understand how difficult it was that they faced. I came a

United statesNorth carolinaSamarskaya oblastDistrict of columbiaJohn nicholsJimmy carterBernie sandersGeorge w bushJohn kasichRonald reaganJames madisonRichard nixonAdolf hitlerTed cruzHillary clintonHarvey wasserman