comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Amul canada - Page 1 : comparemela.com

The Taste Of India Prevails In Canada - Intellectual Property

Cointreau sues cannabis company; Amazon TLDs go live; Malta joins IP Register in Blockchain – news digest

Cointreau sues cannabis company; Amazon TLDs go live; Malta joins IP Register in Blockchain – news digest
worldtrademarkreview.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from worldtrademarkreview.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Times Top10: Today s Top News Headlines and Latest News from India & across the World

2. Grand Slam No.20 for Djokovic What would it take for tennis fans to adore Novak Djokovic? He is respected, certainly, but the patrons of the All England Club, or Roland Garros, reserve their deepest emotions for Federer and Nadal. The Serb is no less a player and no less a leader. Yet, here he was imploring a full-capacity crowd at Centre Court to give him his due, as they chanted: Matteo.. Matteo. This played out midway through the Wimbledon final on Sunday, when the tie was balanced at a set apiece. Djokovic regrouped and responded to the challenge as is his wont. He triumphed. He won his third consecutive Wimbledon championship, and sixth overall, beating Matteo Berrettini of Italy 6-7 (4), 6-4, 6-4, 6-3.

AMUL wins Trademark case in Federal Court of Canada

Subscribe AMUL wins Trademark case in Federal Court of Canada The Court held that the defendant, a company by the name Amul Canada infringed the exclusive trademark and copyright of the brand name AMUL owned by Indian companies and awarded damages of $15,000 in favour of Amul. Amul and Federal Court of Canada The Federal Court at Ontario, Canada permanently barred a company Amul Canada from infringing trademark and copyright of the plaintiffs - Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Limited and Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. - owners of the trademark AMUL (India s largest food brand). Justice Alan S Diner held that the defendants infringed the exclusive trademark and copyright of the plaintiffs and awarded damages of $10,000 for trademark, $5,000 for copyright infringements aside for lump sum legal costs on a solicitor and client basis of $17,733.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.