examination. he doesn t know whether or not it was metzger that examined her. but he went to tucson to talk to katherine. he confirmed katherine didn t know where she was going she had no communication with the family. she didn t know she was reported missing. she didn t know the children were missing her. as soon as she found out the children were concerned about her she contacted them made a reason to return home and she did return home. tito s daughter, the brother of let me go to tenay jackson. can you comment on what you just heard? yes. basically what i wanted to say before we had gone off, you know i want to make it clear that she was not kidnapped. she was not kidnapped. it was a big misunderstanding about that. she was not kidnapped. as far as the legalities of the will i stay out of that.
was challenged. they take her away. don t want her to have any contact. i think it s a much to do about nothing. there s a lot of money involved and that tends to get people ore heated. ann thank you for coming. did they have standing to challenge this? they don t have standing their time bar california would require an objection to file a proceeding within 120 days. that has clearly come and gone. the number one reason that people talk about the validity of a will in the absence of a bona fide challenge is the hope of a settlement. these documents give the trustees broad discretion to settle any claim against the estate. you think they are looking for a settlement? without a doubt. we will talk more and have a conclusion of this special report. plus the latest from wisconsin. we are getting disturbing
whatever they can. especially the black artists. july 7th, 2002, the king of pop was in harlem taking his label sony music to has can. and claiming the music industry exploited black artists. the president of the record division is a mean, he s a racist, and he s very, very, very devilish. michael s stunning statement that day at the public event is sited as evidence israel was forged and there for invalid. in 2002 swore under perjury the will was signed michael jackson another person on that will in los angeles it clearly shows that on july 7th my
janet was upset. said quotes about i don t want her to do that she shouldn t be doing this. why? because janet her career is not doing that well it s lagging. that gave randy and the guy as little bit of mocks ee to go after john the lawyer who runs the estate who by the way hadz done a brill jaiant job. michael died 500 million in the hole. he is just about even and the he is skate is valued at a billion dollars going on tour with pepsi, cirque du soleil and done a wonderful job. the will is phony. california superior court and said no the will is valid. this is about a bunch of people trying to get their hands on a bunch of money. michael never wanted them to have anything to do with his children his father or brothers or sisters. can you stay on and have ample time to respond to what
it all. he is skaet special lis mark geragos and bob massi. what s your take? probably the most interesting comment i heard was from the capable lawyer that does probate in los angeles that said what s the motive in she? these people questioning all of this don t have standing. even if the will is invalidated the children still are the primary beneficiaries. if katherine is not competent and can t act in the best interest of the children the court can move to have her removed co guardian appointed. mark geragos what do you say, sir? i tend to agree with her when she said all families have issues. you could easily interpret this as one part of the family wanted katherine to get away she is in her 80s taking care of teenagers. maybe they thought her health