predeceased michael jackson that 40 percent goes into the children s trust. so the children get it regardless of what katherine does now? absolutely. the only thing the older siblings could have been maneuvering to get is mom giving them money with the settlement you suggested earlier? the settlement or if catherine jackson as a guardian for her they would be given oo salary under california law. mark geragos do you think i know you are being calm and political and i know you represent represented michael jackson. i know you are an ace attorney. don t you think in some circumstances what happened here would demand a grand jury probe, would demand an investigation by authorities looking into whether or not a potential crime has been committed? no, wbecause as some people
was challenged. they take her away. don t want her to have any contact. i think it s a much to do about nothing. there s a lot of money involved and that tends to get people ore heated. ann thank you for coming. did they have standing to challenge this? they don t have standing their time bar california would require an objection to file a proceeding within 120 days. that has clearly come and gone. the number one reason that people talk about the validity of a will in the absence of a bona fide challenge is the hope of a settlement. these documents give the trustees broad discretion to settle any claim against the estate. you think they are looking for a settlement? without a doubt. we will talk more and have a conclusion of this special report. plus the latest from wisconsin. we are getting disturbing
it all. he is skaet special lis mark geragos and bob massi. what s your take? probably the most interesting comment i heard was from the capable lawyer that does probate in los angeles that said what s the motive in she? these people questioning all of this don t have standing. even if the will is invalidated the children still are the primary beneficiaries. if katherine is not competent and can t act in the best interest of the children the court can move to have her removed co guardian appointed. mark geragos what do you say, sir? i tend to agree with her when she said all families have issues. you could easily interpret this as one part of the family wanted katherine to get away she is in her 80s taking care of teenagers. maybe they thought her health
predeceased michael jackson that 40 percent goes into the children s trust. so the children get it regardless of what katherine does now? absolutely. the only thing the older siblings could have been maneuvering to get is mom giving them money with the settlement you suggested earlier? the settlement or if catherine jackson as a guardian for her they would be given oo salary under california law. mark geragos do you think i know you are being calm and political and i know you represent represented michael jackson. i know you are an ace attorney. don t you think in some circumstances what happened here wouldnd a grand jury probe, would demand an investigation by authorities looking into whether or not a potential crime has been committed? no, wbecause as some people
it all. he is skaet special lis mark geragos and bob massi. what s your take? probably the most interesting comment i heard was from the capable lawyer that does probate in los angeles that said what s the motive in she? these people questioning all of this don t have standing. even if the will is invalidated the children still are the primary beneficiaries. if katherine is not competent and can t act in the best interest of the children the court can move to have her removed co guardian appointed. mark geragos what do you say, sir? i tend to agree with her when she said all families have issues. you could easily interpret this as one part of the family wanted katherine to get away she is in her 80s taking care of teenagers. maybe they thought her health