The proposed funding, the city will reimburse warriors for improvements to infrastructure capped at 120 million. Funds are restricted to three sources we have discussed. Proposed operations and maintenance, we have reached out to city departments. The police funded the cost estimates are to be determined. We will be in the cost will be associated with calls for service during events and non events. Responses to illegal vendors and such. Fire anticipates no direct fiscal impact from the project. Number of staff and hours worked will not change as a result of this development. As mentioned by chief lombardi the San Francisco department may contract with warriors for emergency services. Certainly if they are colocated, that makes sense. No impact to the project as Golden State Warrior also pay to maintain open space they create. For dpw and mta we are currently working with both those departments. There will be parking and service officers. There will need to be traffic and cleaning servi
Questions. Is there any Public Comment . Commissioners is there any comment. I have a comment i am happy that you get your ppa letter from planning and i like how you are lining up your ducks there, and especially with the other two lots, and they are all going to come under the same Environmental Review and that is the real smart way of doing it. And otherwise, you have environmental done for one and you end up having to do and start the other one three years from now which drags everything out. And yeah, i think that it is coming along pretty nice and also, kutos, to the renting department for getting the new, tenants in there and getting the money and keep the money coming in, and that is also very good. And so, that is, and that concludes my comments. And thank you. And thank you for the presentation, by the way. Thank you. And thank you. Thank you, that presentation was very clear and exciting to see everything moving forward and i am also impressed of getting all of the different
Community on eir and hosting december 13th will be viewed as trying to ignore public input and feedback. It is a busy time for many of our families and residents. I know the request has been to move the scoping meeting to after the new years in midjanuary, when people are back and will be able to focus attention on this important project in the neighborhood. Okay. Im happy to talk to the larger project milestones briefly, which is just while we first fiscal feasibility finding and environmental e are view process. As we talk about term sheet endorsements between february and april that anticipated a draft N Environmental report would be published may to june of 2013 and final eir would be in early 2014 along with proposed approval of transaction documents. Trust consistency approvals that would need to be obtained in the spring of 2014. That would keep us on a schedule tol begin construction december of 2014. I want to say one other thing. In addition to the Fire Department we have rea
Input and want to whether it appears we are rushing through this process because of how much a priority i agree. How much a priority it is to bring the warriors to San Francisco. We want to see that happen but not at the expense of the process. We absolutely agree. This only works if it truly works. It is not unprecedented to go from an exclusive negotiating agreement to this. We had an a threemonth meeting before it passed accountability but then took time from fiscal feasibility to have the environmental approvals. We have a schedule i can discuss with you. The proposed meetings between now january. I will be at the maritime meeting tomorrow to talk about the maritime proposals for the three sides of the pier on 19th as i mentioned at 1 p. M. There is is a land use hearing which will be an informational hearing. We have had presentations in the cac, now the Port Commission and felt like it was important to do that at the board of supervisors prior to asking decision on fiscal feasibi
Nutter, department of the environment. Approval of resolution commending director Melanie Nutter for her service to the department of the environment and to the city and county of San Francisco. Whereas mayor gavin newsom appointed Melanie Nutter director for the San Francisco department of the environment in august 2010 and whereas melanie nut r has continued to direct the department of the environment and provide San Franciscos leadership under mayor edwin m. Lee and whereas Melanie Nutter directed the department of the environment of 110 staff for the past 31 2 years and helped to make San Francisco the greenest city in north america, and whereas Melanie Nutter helped champion environmental policy achievements in San Francisco, including such accomplishments as ill read four of them, but there are many, many accomplishments. Successful implementation of the mandatory composting cycling policy that has helped move the city toward the goal of zero waste by 2020 with an 80 diversion ra