something people don t understand. that the justice system is not a morality. go to a minister or rabbi or priest if you want morality. if you want it legally correctt, that s what lawyers know how to do. we tryy hard to bringg together morality and legality if we can. if you are a priest or minister and someone tells you they killed somebody and buried the body. the right thing to do is turn to the police. you can t do that if you are a priestt or minister. the law said you have to protect the confidence. we have a conflict of what is right and moral and legal on the other. don t expect too much from our legal system. don t expect truth. don t expect justice. because that s not what it is going to give you. that s right. it is it a terrible thing to tell the law students. they come and wanting to do
this case and be angry and try to the system but don t take it out on the judge who did a good jobb and the juror who is did a good job. and the lawyerrs did their job. everybody did their jobb. the system worked even though we have a right to be angry at the result and if we feel that the result did not comport. do we need changes in the criminal justice system? when there is evidence that a defendant contributed to the disappearance of evidence, i think that should be a separate crime. i think she was charged too little with misleading the police. she should have been charged with obstruction of justice and with holding evidence and putting the police on a wild goose chase and served 10 or 15 years for those crimes even if she had nothing to do with the murder. i couldn t agree more. professor, aultz a pleasure to
this case and be angry and try to the system but don t take it out on the judge who did a good jobb and the juror who is did a good job. and the lawyerrs did their job. everybody did their jobb. the system worked even though we have a right to be angry at the result and if we feel that the result did not comport. do we need changes disappearance of evidence, i think that should be a separate crime. i think she was charged too little with misleading the police. she should have been charged with obstruction of justice and with holding evidence and putting the police on a wild goose chase and served 10 or 15 years for those crimes even if she had nothing to do with the murder. i couldn t agree more. professor, aultz a pleasure to
economy. that affects overall consumer confidence and impacts wall street and impacts the global economy and has a ripple affect that has more magnitude in terms of impact. you mentioned housing. i want to look at another graph. home prices have seen a negative trend minus 10.1 percent compared to the average change during the recoveryy . i hope people can make out how this is. 2001 versus the average and 1980 . the current is absolutely dismal. that is the best way to describe it. we are falling behind in a couple of levels. if americans don t have jobs we shouldn t be buying hopes. i am not surprised that housing is showing the impact because americans are doing the responsible thing. if you don t have security, you will not buy a home .
was a miscarriage of justice and not a carriage of justice. how can you help them to put it in perspective so they are not cynical and angryy and say the technicalities of the law are alowwing guilty people to walk on the treats and become millionaires. she s going to get rich off of i hope not. i hope the state of florida takes every penny and uses it to help the real victims of crimes. lookk, people should be angry. you should be angry if you think an injustice has done. don t take it out on the jurors. it is wrong to have signs fearing for their lifes and jurors have to know they are free to come to the legally correctt decision without fear of any kind of recrimination . there is a difference between being angry and justice was not done to caylee and the killer if there was a killer is free . there will never be justice in