have security, you re not buying a home. hand in hand. on the secondhand what the data shows we re not recovering in way we typically have been doing after the great depression he we can t follow a play book we ve seen in any sort of recovery. we re in sort of a no-man s land and no-man s world where we re in a situation you can t spend data, you can t look at a play book for, this is a different type of animal we re dealing with altogether. mike: it s an interesting fact there is one market in all of america where housing prices have not declined, but actually improved, washington d.c. imagine that. mike: i find it interesting, because it s the only market that posted a positive gain and it s experiencing its 23rd consecutive month leading in the housing market. and it had positive annual growth for 17 consecutive months. shibani, is it possible that the reason so many people in washing, both democrats and republicans, don t understand the severity of this
free. there will neveren justice in this case, be angry and try to change the system if you think it s deserved to be changed. don t take it out on the judge who did a good job and the jurors who thought they did as good a job as they could. and everybody did their job. the system worked even though we have a right to be angry at the result. if we feel the result did not comport with truth and justice. do we need changes in the judicial system if if so, what changes should we demand. if there s evidence that the defendants contributed to the disappearance of evidence, that should be a different crime. i think she was charged too little with misleading the police. should have been charged with obstruction of justice. should have been charged with withholding evidence and putting the police on a wild goose chase and should have served 10 or 15 years in prison and for those crimes, even if she had nothing to do with the murder. couldn t agree more.
we re in the law business. mike: say that again, a lot of people would understand. the justice system is not the morality business. you want morality go to a philosopher, a minister, a rabbi, a priest. if you want justice, a philosopher. if you want something to be legally correct, that s what lawyers know how to do. now, we try hard to bring together morality and legality as much as we can. but take, for example, the issue if your a a priest or a minister and somebody tells you a deep dark secret that they killed somebody and buried the body. the right thing to do is to turn to the police, country do that if you re a priest or minister, the law says you have a protect the secret or confidence. often we will have a conflict what s right and moral on one hand and legal on the the other. mike: in another interview, you said don t expect too much from our legal system. don t expect truth. don t expect justice, because that s not what it s going to get you. that s right. and it s
justice system failed, that this was a miscarriage of justice not a carriage of justice. how can you help them to put this in perspective so they don t become cynical and angry and scream and say, but the technicalities of the law are allowing guilty people to go out there and walk in the streets and become millionaires, that s what this young lady is going to be, she s going to get rich off this. i sure hope not. i hope the state of florida takes every penny she earns on the case and help real victims of crimes. mike: look, people should be angry and you should be angry if you think an injustice has been done, don t take it outen the jurors. wrong to have signs saying jurors are not welcome. or wrong for jurors to fear for their lives. jurors have to know they re free to come to a legally free decision, a difference between being angry. sure, if you re angry, justice was not done to caylee, the killer whoever it was, if there was a killer, is
that are a fraction of our size and it just continues to so what s happening with the administration, is proposing and the way of spending, in the the way of policies, really just isn t working right now. mike: we have a couple of graphs and i think to point out that this is not just sort of a modest, typical type of recovery, the graphs, and i m going to put one on the board, this is going to show us the jobs at that we ve seen, basically, .4% in the the first two years of our so-called recovery. after the depression, the recovery was almost 12% increase, and the total number of jobs, this is shocking. this is not much of a recovery, we came out of the depression much better. and my point is that it this is the only graph that really matters. if americans aren t seeing jobs created and don t feel like one, if they don t feel they re going to get a job and impacts confidence and a job that impacts confidence they don t have a job and don t have money in their pockets to one, pay th