some pretty wild posts recently on social media. recentlysocial mone of them wast the cocaine found the white house was at belonged to eithern the president or his son. are you willing to sayt or that that s not the case, that they don t belong to them? i don t have a response to that because we have to be carefuolec about the hatch act and the hatch act. they still don he hatcht know what that is. the level of security and surveillance presente leve n the white house begs the question of why they haven t locateduestion. su. is biden stonewall stonewalling yet another investigation? m to the bidens never seem to get to the bottom of anythin g. . and with a growing number of serious corruption, corruption d growinallegations, maybe it se they don t want to get to the dettom of it the bot. despite a sweetheart plea deal from biden s department of justiced e, the congressional probes into hunter bidenngressis and his family s shady dealings are ramping up evidence, evidence of
they may not pay attention every day to foreign policy the way i doreign po, i think they understand whenever they see a weakness, the world stage. and kellyanne, you and i know we had the accords, which were peace deals, the first peace deals between israel and arab states in 26 years. wepiec handed those to the biden administration. and what happened within, you know, justbide three months, hamas was attacking israel within seven months under biden nths ham s, the taliban had taken over kabul. and within a year you havekabula the worst war on european soil since world war two when russia invaded ukraine. evere is a lack, a key lack of deterrence. and every theater in this planety theate the coming from e all the way down to his secretary of state and the rest of his national security leadership. so well said. it s very important to remember aly il that. morgan, thank you. so in our remaining time, i m goin g to point out that in 2024, many americans sayingok that they may look for
week, the question bragg left everyone asking today is ,bewe r where s the beef? here s we re going to run into legal problems because s the indictment does not say what that second crime is ,ly il which is completely inexplicable. e to mto me. dee entire point of an indictment is to tell the defendant, here s what a charged with throughputs. he said federal campaign election law. but this is ne hw yorke eral st he said state election law. net but this is e soa campaign s fo president , which is a federalis caoffice.nt whi and there s literally one word about this in the statemenchs t said something about tax, but they didn t take a deduction ofd realidn questions about this disappointment. it s hard to imagine convincinog a jury that that they shouldid get their one source said totru. me, this is donald trump.in you don t bring a knife to a gunfight. i had hoped tha mt therore wd be more in the indictment. translation this case is a dead dog i n the middle of the road.haomeone ha