well. and that s been a big sticking point for you. it is. because he s and what they do in this probable cause statement where they lay out why they re charging him or what the basis for the charges, number one, these are all the things alec baldwin the actor did, sort of failing in his duty as an actor. and as a producer who had some responsibility for what happened on the set. even if we re not looking at him as an actor, this is how the producer failed the set. they re sort of putting forward two alternative theories for how he went wrong. what this comes down to and what any manslaughter is going to come down to is called reasonableableness. was this person s actions, how does it relate to how a reasonable, quote, unquote person would have acted in the same circumstances. dutch had said a little earlier a lot of things were open to interpretation like what ought to be the right way to behave on a movie set either as an actor or producer. we ll see how it plays out. he is say
execute that search warrant until september, two months later. the defense will try and say that this means there could have been evidence pointing to other alternative theories but police never followed up on it. by the time they did, that evidence was gone. so, that s a huge component of what we re going to see this upcoming week. and one of the key points prosecutors trying to make this week was that murdaugh wasn t crying in the aftermath of his son and wife s deaths. here s some of that 911 audio that was played in the trial. it s followed by the first officer to arrive on the scene s testimony, so we ll listen to that. this is a long story. my son was in a boat wreck a few months back. he s been getting threats. most of it benign stuff, we didn t take serious. he s been getting punched. i know that s what it is. okay. his immediate reaction was to start telling me about an incident that happened with his
group and called into a podcast and offered alternative theories in an effort to shade the light from him. it looks like again he is still the accused. he has the presumption of innocence. some of that stuff could come in and i m sure cops are doing forensics on it now. dana: five key pieces of evidence against him. do you rank them when you think about a case like this? i did naturally in writing it. fox news folks asked me the affidavit is in legal language. they asked me to pull out the five key components that the prosecution has. it is up on the opinion page now. the dna was really the confirming factor here. the affidavit is written chronologically and a reason it culminates at the end with the match of the dna they took out of the garbage. december 28th they get the dna out of the garbage. 29 it matches, 30 they make the
because your playing against yourself, right. when you offer these alternative theories. i don t believe the judge will buy that he has sovereign immunity because he s not being sued, that means somebody is trying to sue a government official for performing some duty that is within the scope of their official duty. so that dog likely wouldn t hunt. and i don t think the executive privilege claim will fair much better. there was also some reporting that he was going to argue attorney/client privilege. i don t know if he made that argument in the courtroom. but the other tell here, yasmin, is that at the end of it all, he said, well, at a minimum, maybe you could just delay it until after the election, that is almost a concession that, look, judge, i know these aren t all that persuasive, but you could at leach push it until after the elections. i have a feeling, he s probably going to lose on all fronts.
just stood there and tried to debate. and give me alternative theories, and let s come up with another option, and it is exactly the kind of nonsense that he spewed at the last confirmation hearing, just talking, talking, i described it as word solid. it is exactly who he is. he has proven who he is over and over again. the disrespect that he showed the senator coming to my office, at his request, it was so simple to put on a mask, and had he done so there would be no story. so i just don t understand how a doctor can treat someone that way. i am one of the 22 million citizens of florida that he would be in charge of. and he just didn t care. do you republican colleagues in the senate care, though? they cannot all be anti mask, anti vax, anti-science people? at some point he is the outlier? they are not that way. i know they are not that way. there might be a few. but they are really not. i know that