an incredible not to mention the influence is from the parents and the whole process. having their whole lives interrupted. everything going on. judge jeanine: mark, can the parents influence the children during a period of time when they are not allowed to talk to investigators? the first thing they can do is watch mommy on tv and she is implanting what she wants them to remember are i mean that is very easy to do without directly confronting the kids. the other thing is the two times that these boys were talked to, that was the preliminary investigation before the mother had inconsistencies and lies she was confronted on and she changed the timeline. when they talked to them initially, those questions are worthless right now. judge jeanine: and as the investigation continues the questions become different depending on what facts we steaked.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20111030:01:03:00
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
and the polygraph is the quickest way to elimb national closest people po the victim. the detectives did not know she was going to fail that miserably. judge jeanine: and they didn t release that, she did. they had an obligation because they never thought they would talk to her without an attorney ever again. there is a problem with polygraph and a reason why they are not admissible because of their unreliability. the prosecution and defense both agree they are admissible but that situation rarely occurs. so they are admissible. look, under the normal course of events you would agree they are not admissible and that s because of their unreliability. but they are not a threat. i m going to rule that we are not decideing that now and i will go right to dr. wecht. before we hit the end of the show, doctor, from a forensics point of view based upon what you have heard, where are we going here? i think you have got to pin down some of these things and i get back to the poi
judge jeanine: could the boys know nothing that would help solve this mystery? it is possible but it is difficult to know where they were the night this incident occurred. it is possible. sure, it is possible. judge jeanine: the mother says they said they heard noises but i don t know if it was or after they went to sleep. does that suggest to you that maybe the boys heard something? sounds like they were at least there and, of course, we don t know what they heard or witnessed.itt netanyahued but judge jeanine: do you find that kids are credible witnesses? especially kids around the 8, 9, 10-year-old age if you really want to know who is selling crack or who shot you you ask the kid counter corner, they will be accurate. ing. how do you assess if they are telling the truth and if
it seems that the police corroborated it. she has come out and said it and the police have spoken to her four times. by the end of this we will know if the call was made. i just want to ask you one more question, bill, will the children by interviewed by the investigators? that is a joe tac api na question. isn t the fact that the local lawyer said it is not good for the kids to talk and joe wants the kids to talk. he said he is going to schedule something next week. is that going to happen? you said that, your honor, i didn t. that is not me saying it. judge jeanine: all right. bill. always good to see you. maybe we ll see you in kansas city this week. 10-4. you re buying dinner. judge jeanine: and now, our judge jeanine: and now, our panel reacts, next. ( phone ringing ) okay. uhh. the bad news, it s probably totaled.
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.