an incredible not to mention the influence is from the parents and the whole process. having their whole lives interrupted. everything going on. judge jeanine: mark, can the parents influence the children during a period of time when they are not allowed to talk to investigators? the first thing they can do is watch mommy on tv and she is implanting what she wants them to remember are i mean that is very easy to do without directly confronting the kids. the other thing is the two times that these boys were talked to, that was the preliminary investigation before the mother had inconsistencies and lies she was confronted on and she changed the timeline. when they talked to them initially, those questions are worthless right now. judge jeanine: and as the investigation continues the questions become different depending on what facts we steaked. it is interesting that the
judge jeanine: could the boys know nothing that would help solve this mystery? it is possible but it is difficult to know where they were the night this incident occurred. it is possible. sure, it is possible. judge jeanine: the mother says they said they heard noises but i don t know if it was or after they went to sleep. does that suggest to you that maybe the boys heard something? sounds like they were at least there and, of course, we don t know what they heard or witnessed.itt netanyahued but judge jeanine: do you find that kids are credible witnesses? especially kids around the 8, 9, 10-year-old age if you really want to know who is selling crack or who shot you you ask the kid counter corner, they will be accurate. ing. how do you assess if they are telling the truth and if
judge jeanine: could the boys know nothing that would help solve this mystery? it is possible but it is difficult to know where they were the night this incident occurred. it is possible. sure, it is possible. judge jeanine: the mother says they said they heard noises but i don t know if it was or after they went to sleep. does that suggest to you that maybe the boys heard something? sounds like they were at least there and, of course, we don t know what they heard or witnessed.itt netanyahued but judge jeanine: do you find that kids are credible witnesses? especially kids around the 8, 9, 10-year-old age if you really want to know who is selling crack or who shot you you ask the kid counter corner, they will be accurate. ing. how do you assess if they are telling the truth and if
we know it was made. it is absolute. the police say they have the records. judge jeanine: agree with that joey? i agree it was made. after that i disagree. we know it is made and we have the mother deborah bradleye adamant that she didn t make the phone call. the phones were all taken with the baby and the lights left on except for the baby s room which was dark. the recipient has a 50 second phone call that leaves no message and no voice. what is amazing here, mark, is that the recipient says she didn t answer and didn t know who called and what was said and doesn t know who answered it. how could see not know who has her cell phone? what is the relevance of all this. what does it mean to the further investigation. judge jeanine: this is the night the baby disappeared. what do we know about the message that was left?
judge jeanine: baby lisa will turn one on november 11. she has two half brothers who were there the night she disappeared. the night baby lisa vanished, they were in the home. the only witnesses other than mom deborah. lisa s half brothers, blake, age 8, jeremy s son from a previous relationship and michael age five, deborah s son from her first marriage. judge jeanine: how are the boys doing? they are doing okay. judge jeanine: the evening of october, deborah says the boys watch a movie in the house while she drinks on the front porch with her neighbor. later, blake goes to sleep new hampshire his room. deborah brings five-year-old mike until bed with her along with a stray kitten they found