mr. chief justice, and may it please the court: the secretary of homeland security exercised his statutory discretion to make a policy judgment. he found that the benefits of mpp were outweighed by its domestic, humanitarian, and foreign policy costs. yet, the lower courts ordered dhs to reinstate mpp in perpetuity, requiring ongoing negotiations with mexico to send thousands of non-citizens into its territory. that was error. on the first question, section 1225 confers a discretionary return authority that the secretary may use, not a mandate. nothing in the statutory text or history compels dhs to use mpp whenever congress fails to provide sufficient funds for universal detention. respondents identify no one who interpreted section 1225 this way before this lawsuit, no member of congress or executive branch official or anyone else. and on this reading, every presidential administration, in an unbroken line for the past quarter century, has been in open violation of the in
of its clean air act authority. it has used it differently before on now that i have you here, we are online at cis.org and we have a podcast. it is on all of the usual podcast places. today, we are having the panel that we have called fighting biden in court, a look at immigration cases. this is a major issue in the trump administration with a whole series of lawsuits challenging their immigration actions. the by administration is facing the same kind of thing. we have three people who have a lot of experience and knowledge of this issue. the first, a senior fellow for immigration and homeland security at the center for renewing america was the acting deputy secretary of dhs and acting head of u.s. cis under the trump administration. at the receiving end of a lot of the limit litigation in the previous administration. joe is former general counsel of the u.s. cis and former director. has long experience on the legislative and executive branches in dealing with immigr
are online at cis.org and we have a podcast. it is on all of the usual podcast places. today, we are having the panel that we have called fighting biden in court, a look at immigration cases. good afternoon. my name is mark krikorian. now that i have you here, we are online at cisi.org, and we have a podcast that is in usual podcast places. we are having a panel today that we call fighting biden in court: a look at cases against the administration. this was a major issue in the trump administration with a series of lawsuits challenging their immigration actions. the biden administration is facing the same kind of thing. we have three people who have a lot of experience and knowledge on this issue. ken cuccinelli, senior fellow for immigration answer and homeland security at the center for a new america, was the acting deputy secretary of dhs and acting head of uscis under the trump administration. so at the receiving end of a lot of litigation against the previous adminis
now that i have you here, we are online at cis.org, and we have a podcast that is in usual podcast places. we are having a panel today that we call fighting biden in court: a look at cases against the administration. this was a major issue in the trump administration with a series of lawsuits challenging their immigration actions. the biden administration is facing the same kind of thinking. we have three people who have a lot of experience and knowledge on this issue. ken cuccinelli, senior fellow for homeland security at the center for a new america, was the accurate acting deputy secretary of dhs under the trump administration, so at the receiving end of a lot of litigation against the previous administration a. joetta low is founder of the joe edlow is founder of the edlow group and has experience in the legislative branch of with immigration a. finally, a former immigration judge, former hill staffer, has written substantial portions of immigration law, and has bee