technology for really isolating us. people stay indoors. they don t want to know their neighbors. they feel if they get to meet them, then the neighbors will tell them to turn their music down. we live in our little cells with our computers and our phones and if something fishy is going on with neighbors, we turn a blind eye. we think it started in the 6 60s with the bystander apathy. if you want to make a change, get to know your neighbors. go to pot luck suppers. get involved in the neighborhood watch. know the names. anything suspicious, call the police. better to be wrong than to find out later you had this situation going on right next door to you. dr. landis, do you agree this is symptomatic of a culture that is basically much more defined according to my own personal interests and disregarding of others? i think so, but i also think we have to think about eccentricity and think about privacy and weighing those as well. every time we see something that s a little bit off, li
is it that involves three brothers, three young girls and sustaining this deception for ten years? well, it s rare, but we are seeing more and more of it. and you have to understand the motivation here is sexual. we don t call them hostages so much as sexually motivated captors and their captives. we have found actually the sexual dungeons where the women have been held for years and released. if they re above the age if they don t disappear when they re children, it really doesn t get much press. in the last few years we ve had jaycee dugard. in austria, natasha campus and joseph fritzl and his daughter. how many more children have been abducted and are being held in dungeon situations? it s incredible. dr. landis, steven anthony said, i m quoting him, these young ladies have provided us with the ultimate definition of survival and perseverance. i have to say, their suffering to me is unimaginable. how did they survive? i think that we ve seen in
impeach him and obama. if you disagree with a liberal on gun control, they say you want more dead kids. can we just explain that we both don t want people to die, and focus on the policy, and decide whether or not the policy works? we know this for a fact. landis stole those guns from his mom when he killed those kids. the background check would not have stopped that. two things would have stopped himp institutionalization. he should have been put away. the second thing, a bullet to the head. those are the two things you should care about, the vulnerability of schools and keeping crazy people off the streets. i admire them trying to get something done. i don t see how this stops this sort of thing. sorry. first of all, i think we ought to keep in mind, this is not gun control. it s not taking guns away, looking at there was a big loophole, and the loophole was gun sales and internet sales, all we re doing here is to
impeach him and obama. if you disagree with a liberal on gun control, they say you want more dead kids. can we just explain that we both don t want people to die, and focus on the policy, and decide whether or not the policy works? we know this for a fact. landis stole those guns from his mom when he killed those kids. the background check would not have stopped that. two things would have stopped himp institutionalization. he should have been put away. the second thing, a bullet to the head. those are the two things you should care about, the vulnerability of schools and keeping crazy people off the streets. i admire them trying to get something done. i don t see how this stops this sort of thing. sorry. first of all, i think we ought to keep in mind, this is not gun control. it s not taking guns away, looking at there was a big loophole, and the loophole was gun sales and internet sales, all we re doing here is to expand current checks.
enhancing drugs. if he and the government win their case against armstrong, landis could make millions. as a federal whistle blower, he could reportedly be entitled up to a quarter of the penalty. shepard: rich, didn t lance armstrong try to settle this out of court? yes. in a statement his attorney writes, lance and his representatives were constructively over these last weeks with federal lawyers to resolve this case fairly. but those talks failed because we disagree about whether the postal service was damaged. the u.s. postal service says its brand is now associated with the most sophisticated doping program cycling has ever seen and in today s economic climate, the u.s. postal service is simply not in a position to allow lance armstrong or any of the other defendants to walk away with the tens of millions of dollars they illegitimately procured. usps is in financial trouble. shepard: rich edison live in dc. fox extreme weather alert