cold, calculated and premeditated manner without any pretense of moral or legal justification, yes. reviewing the aggravating factors that we unanimously found to be established beyond a reasonable doubt, we the jury unanimously find that the aggravating factors are sufficient to warrant a possible death sentence, yes. one or more individual jurors find that one or more mitigating circumstances was established by the greater weight of the evidence, yes. we the jury unanimously find that the aggravating factors that were proven beyond a reasonable doubt outweigh the mitigating circumstances, no. signed october 13th by the foreperson. mr. benjamin? verdict form as to count two,
factor, the first-degree murder of martin was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel, yes. we the jury unanimously find that the state has established beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of the aggravating factor, the first-degree murder of martin was committed in a cold, calculated and premeditated manner without any pretense of moral or legal justification, yes. reviewing the aggravating factors that we found to be established beyond a reasonable doubt, we the jury find that the aggravating factors are sufficient to warrant a possible sentence of death, yes. one or more individual jurors find that one or more mitigating
calculated and pre-meditated manner without any pretense of moral or legal justification, yes. reviewing the aggravating factors that we found to be established beyond a reasonable doubt, we the jury unanimously find the aggravating factors are sufficient to warrant a possible sentence of death, yes. one or more individual jurors find that one or more mitigating circumstances was established by the greater weight of the evidence, yes. we the jury unanimously find the aggravating factors that were proven beyond a reasonable doubt outweigh the mitigating circumstances established as to count two, martin, no. signed and dated by the foreperson mr. benjamin thomas.
comfortable answering it. from the available information that you have, the evidence you ve been able to see, and you were in your former position, would you be recommending charges? i d have to know more of what the government has learned in this case and what it still seeks to learn. i think there are important questions, evidentiary questions that we don t have visibility into. you know, oftentimes in evaluating whether to charge somebody with a violation of the sections that the president that undergirded the search warrant affidavit, the government is looking to see if there is sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that comprise what we refer to as prosecutors as aggravating factors. what s the volume of classified information that we re talking about that was in a place that was not authorized to be, what s the highest level of classification, how was it found, was it found in some scattered place where many people had access to it, was it