Over the samarco mine disaster earlier this month. A volatile ride for chinese market. They close higher. This as the imf is expected to add the chinese currency to its symbolically important reserve basket. Still buying, black friday may be turning gray but the National Retail federation says over half of Americans Still did some shopping. U. S. Futures are looking like this on this monday morning as were back from the holidays, back from the turkey. The s p 500 seen up by 3. 5 points. Dau jones up by almost 30 and the nasdaq expected to open higher to the tune of roughly 7 points. This is after the s p had a little change shrugging off the volatility on the chinese trading and volumes obviously very low. But they should pick up again today. European markets, meanwhile, are looking somewhat mixed. The foots see 100 is down because the pressure is coming from the mining pressure. The xetra dax and ftse mib trending higher after a little bit of weakness after the trading session. All ey
Senator schumer i dont see that they have reporter c. R. s. Senator schumer well, look, the bottom line here is, the n. R. A. Is a powerful opponent. The gun lobby is a powerful all opponent and the best weapon we have on our side is the outrage from the American People. It is growing. If we keep at it. We will win. We dont control the house. We dont control the senate, but we have the people of america on our side and if we continue to have votes and force people to vote, we will win. Let me tell you something today. There are a good number, not all, but a good number of our republican colleagues dreading these two votes. Next. Reporter if you are serious doing something about guns, why are you trying to attach this to a bill that the president has said he is going to veto . Senator schumer our proposals rescind the underlying bill and just have this so the president will sign them should they pass. Reporter will you fight this in the omnibus . Senator schumer in every place where we
We were telling, chastising other people. Secondly, i believe that currently, theres a system that exists that is on a bipartisan, bicameral basis, and that is that the appropriators, when they become aware of something that may be exactly what the gentleman and mr. Mcgovern was talking about, it would be a very difficult issue we should properly make sure that this country knew we were not going to find. Come back through the congress, too, and i think we do the right thing. The appropriators have another foreign account mrs. Granger has the ability to withhold match up and i think instead of an official Going Forward and holding these governments accountable on their own, i think it should come from the people who gave the money. Not the people that represent the money, so, i want to be a part of working with you. If you get to that point, also. Is there anything further from any member of this committee for this panel . Seeing done, i want to thank you all three of you. Thank you fo
Country. Guest i agree. Look at thesting to different outcomes. The decisions were pro defendant. And, of the search and seizure berger and william rehnquist, they favor the libertyt the cost of , personal and individual. Host we have more cases and we produced a book that is available to you and outlines the cases. It is available on the website. Theng the next few months, this series will reair and you can watch this on television. This will archive on the website. Will hitilable and we it to you quickly. We have a few minutes left. We will take a few calls. Next is pete. Thank you for this. I enjoy this and try to catch it whenever. About the Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and the exclusionary rule being considered with a lot of exceptions. What do you think about the warrant preference Going Forward . There is that tension in the Fourth Amendment with a preference for the warrant and a ness requirement. Guest you see a orange reference construction warrant preference construction.
Around Orange County and the inland empire, but in l. A. Itself, do you have a goal of what you think is reasonable to sign up over the next year or so . Im striving for 220,000. You are. If that takes us a series of years, so be it, but were putting rhettthe resources behind this. It pays us back many times over. It makes business sense first and foremost but it also makes ethical sense. You alluded to this before but cities may intervene on the other side . Were looking to have a lot of other cities who stepped up saying they want to be a part of it, too. We dont have, quote unquote, local government or the federal part of the government saying were against this because if just a few voices decided to challenge, we think we can get a coalition of cities much larger and that is an important counterbalance for any court. They may win this first round judging by what ive heard from the court its in but it will be appealed, of course. As its being appealed, its very important for america