Argument, which took place in november. Argument first this morning in case 18 587, the department of Homeland Security the university of california and the related cases. General francisco. Mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court, in 20, the dr. Ircuit held that daca and the expansion of daca were likely unlawful. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wished to do wish to retain the policy, based on its belief the policy was illegal, and its general opposition to broad nonenforcement policies. The decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The decision is committed to the unreviewable discretion unless a statute restricts it, and nothing requires the department, a Law Enforcement agency, to not enforce the law. Second, the decision to end this nonenforcement policy was eminently reasonable. Was a temporary stopgap measure that on its face could be rescinded
Covid19 has killed hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. It could unfortunately cause additional early deaths down the road and due to the unemployment poverty could cause. To stave off those avoidable deaths America Needs to reenter the booming economy that we had before covid19. To do so we have put on this presentation to listen today from United States senators ted cruz and mike lee page one has ideas about Regulatory Reform that will kickstart our economy as well as keep it going strong on a longterm basis. I would now like to invite senators cruz and senators lee to join me. Before we start todays discussion i must give each senator the opportunity to offer introductory remarks. Senator cruz you are up to bat verse. Well good morning it is a pleasure to join you. Thank you for taking the time to participate and paul its good to see you and mike its good to see you and what a testament to the wonders of technology who are able to have an intimate conversation thousands of mil
Officials tell the Senate Banking committee about the overall state of the financial industry, including the effect of coronavirus made bills passed by congress, and the Federal Reserves Small Business loan program. Please click the mute button. Remind senators that the fiveminute clap still applies. I expect most senators will participate today so we really need to stick to that fiveminute timeframe because we have a vote coming up at noon so i will be tapping the gavel to remind you to wrap it up and to the witnesses i ask you, even though you are asked a question at the end of the five minutes, please Pay Attention to the clock and make those answers after the time has run out prompt and efficient. Seconds i will do a tap on the gavel. The speaking order process, senator brown and i have agreed to go by seniority for this first hybrid hearing. With that, let me start out. Our federale all of predental regulators, the Federal Reserve vice chairman of supervision randal quarles,the co
Now sitting. God save the United States and this honorable court. We will hear arguments in case 19 431 Little Sisters of the poor v. Pennsylvania in the consolidated case. General francisco. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court. In 2011, the government required employers to provide Insurance Coverage for all fda approved contraception, including many religious employers who objected to the coverage, sparking years of litigation. Traditions the best of this countrys commitment to religious liberty, the government sought to resolve the issue by promulgating new rules, excepting those employers who objected to the mandate. Those exemptions are lawful for two reasons. First, they are authorized by whichn 13a4 of the aca, requires employers to provide the types of coverage that the health, resources, and services of administration provide for and support. So it authorizes the agencies to require most employers to provide contraceptive coverage while exempting the small number of empl
In 2011, the government required employers to provide Insurance Coverage for all fda approved contraception, including many religious employers who objected to the coverage, sparking years of litigation. Traditions the best of this countrys commitment to religious liberty, the government sought to resolve the issue by promulgating new rules, excepting those employers who objected to the mandate. Those exemptions are lawful for two reasons. First, they are authorized by whichn 13a4 of the aca, requires employers to provide the types of coverage that the health, resources, and services of administration provide for and support. So it authorizes the agencies to require most employers to provide contraceptive coverage while exempting the small number of employers who have sincere Conscientious Objections. But it does not create an all or nothing choice. Require coverage for everyone or no one. Otherwise, the Longstanding Church exemption, the effective exemption for selfinsured church plan