During the meeting. The ring of a cell phone, pagers and similar soundproducing Electronic Devices are prohibited. Please be advise the chair may order of removal from the meeting room of any persons responsible for the ringing of or use of a cell phone, pager or other similar soundproducing electronic device. C, announcement of time allotment for Public Comments. A member of the public has three minutes to make comments on each agenda item unless the Commission Adopts a shorter period. That is strongly recommended that members of the public who wish to address the commission fill out a speaker card and submit the card to the secretary. The next order of business is item 3, report on actions taken at a previous closed session meeting if any. There are no reportable actions. The next action of business is item the next order of business is matters of unfinished business. There are no matters of unfinished business. The next order of business is item 5, matters of new business consisting
Verses regents of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, in 2017 the fifth circuit held the dapa and the expansion of daca were unlawful, a judge in this court affirmed and in the decisions the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wished to retain the daca policy based on its belief that the policy was illegal, its serious doubts about its illegality and its general opposition to broad, nonenforcement policies. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, its not subject to judicial review. The rescission simply ended a previous nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce the ina against hundreds of thousands of illegal ail epps, but the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agencys unreviewable discretion unless a statute restricts it, and nothing in the ina requires the department, a Law Enforcement agency
The subcommittee will come to order without objection the chair is authorized a recess at any time this hearing examines the federal response to youth cigarette use and fda compliance policy. I now recognize myself for five minutes for an Opening Statement. September 11 this year the administration released disturbing results and at the vaping epidemic continues to grow to alltime highs. And that they use ecigarettes the trends are alarming for High School Students and to show you two visuals in 201712 percent were vaping and a 2019 almost 20 percent that 135 percent increase among High Schoolers. On your left is another visual which is more disturbing in 2173. 3 percent of middle schoolers were vaping today its almost 11 percent 218 percent rise in vaping among middle schoolers and as a parent of three children the statistics are extremely disturbing the data also shows that flavors are driving youth vaping 72 percent whove ate use flavors they use meant or mental which is the most po
Cases. The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussio
The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussion unles