ALBAWABA - The race for the 2024 U.S. Presidential elections is in full swing, marked by the entry of former President Donald Trump into the candidacy f
finding a loophole after a federal judge last week said that anybody who crosses the border has a right to seek asylum by international law, by american law. so the president decided to close the border to ensure these families seeking asylum did not take a step forward on our ground. it really takes a moment for us as americans to try to reconcile what we re witnessing because we are the moral authority when it comes to refugees and asylum. and that picture that is now circulating around the world all of a sudden jeopardizes not just ethnic minorities in this country, people seeking asylum here but their ethnic minorities are vulnerable and up for option, and that is incredibly frightening, lawrence. ron klain, there s a simple option which only democrats in congress next year can find the answer, and that is who gave the order. the secretary of homeland security doesn t mention the use of tear gas and no one down the
so we don t know what the president said. if he wanted to be forthcoming he would release those answers for us. but if he wanted to make sure that witnesses who were cooperating did not contradict him or put the president in a position where he gave a false statement, he could dangle a pardon. and we know, lawrence, back in march 2018 of this year the new york times reported that john dowd was putting out the idea of a pardon to flynn and manafort. so it s been discussed before. the question is whether it s been revisited. the president could put all of this to bed and take it off the table if he would just come out tomorrow and say under no circumstances is he going to pardon paul manafort. and paul manafort loses his fifth amendment protections once he s pardoned, if he is pardoned. you presumably could subpoena him to testify to congress with no fifth amendment protections at all. that s right. you don t have a fifth amendment protection once you ve been
pardoned. you presumably could subpoena him to testify to congress with no fifth amendment protections at all. that s right. you don t have a fifth amendment protection once you ve been cleared and so once other jeopardy or pardon is issued. and so he could be brought before congress. we sought to bring him before congress in the investigation that the republicans shutdown and refused to bring forth. one other point, lawrence, is that the president and his team have tried to use lying, obstructing and tampering as both a shield and a sword. as a shield to protect the president and bob mueller from getting too close to the truth but also a sword as it delays the process by lying and obstructing. the president uses those delays to try to undermine the mueller investigation, and here we re seeing again the president is trying to benefit from his own team obstructing and not cooperating fully with the mueller investigation, which will inevitably take longer. well, we ve seen another
families seeking asylum did not take a step forward on our ground. it really takes a moment for us as americans to try to reconcile what we re witnessing because we are the moral authority when it comes to refugees and asylum. and that picture that is now circulating around the world all of a sudden jeopardizes not just ethnic minorities in this country, people seeking asylum here but their ethnic minorities are vulnerable and up for option, and that is incredibly frightening, lawrence. ron klain, there s a simple wuestion which only democrats in congress next year can find the answer, and that is who gave the order. the secretary of homeland security doesn t mention the use of tear gas and no one down the line in the trump administration will even mention the use of tear gas. lawrence, that s right and it is an important question. but in some ways it s buried inside the bigger question, which is no matter who gave the order donald trump created the