Contributor, karl rove. Futures are pointing to another rally, extending yesterdays gains of 315 points on the dow futures right now, all three major market gauges finishing in the green yesterday, boosted by positive news on the vaccine front from astrazeneca this time. Best buy, burlington and Dicks Sporting Goods are reporting this morning, all the numbers as soon as they hit the tape. Were keeping an eye on the Holiday Shopping season thats largely shifting online. How you can protect yourself against cyber criminals looking to hack the holidays. And replacing an icon, or trying to. Jeopardy will be seeing a show alumnus as its new interim host, making a buzz this morning. Mornings with maria live right now. New york, concrete jungle where dreams are made of. Theres nothing you cant do. Dagen weve got a rally on deck here in the United States, same story in the european markets. Gains across the board, up about 1 in england, france and germany at the moment. In asia overnights, mar
We are still fighting for more money. We think the administration is coming in far too low for our heroes. I think we are close in terms of money, we are yielding on that quite a bit. Close on that except we have to see the language. One of the biggest differences is how we put money in peoples act theand in the cares republicans selfishly put in 150 billion for net operating losses benefiting a small percentage of people. Billion, a similar number in this legislation, the for poorer that is families. It is a refundable tax credit, a child tax credit, earned income tax credit. They have zero. 150 for the wealthiest, zero for the others. We are the reverse. 149, which we took down to 54 billion which we took down by shortening the amount of time it applies. As of yesterday they are still at zero. We are hoping they will come up on that, and we have great opposition in our caucus to the tax cut that is retroactive, having nothing to do with the coronavirus. Then we have issues that relat
Decade up 4. 5 in november so how can Elizabeth Warren and other democrats claim that were in dire straights and we have to abandon capitalism when in fact, its capitalism that has made things so good. I thought Elizabeth Warren was a capitalist from her head to her toe. Look, 3. 5 , ideal with numbers, 3. 5 unemployment, millions have jobs, millions have come off welfare, unfortunately, their job is to tell you how bad things are, how your lot in life is where it is because the wealthy are basically swooing you and amazingly, they poll and they think that it works and they are getting decent numbers, amazingly, but if any of these people move to c aracas or havana and experience the state taking over i think they changed their mind pretty quick. If were talking about just the markets and then Elizabeth Warren, we are just seeing i guess fear of missing out from a lot of investors youve got strong retail numbers that helped people a lot of amazon, for example, these records that youre
Quickest rate in more than a decade up 4. 5 in november so how can Elizabeth Warren and other democrats claim that were in dire straights and we have to abandon capitalism when in fact, its capitalism that has made things so good. I thought Elizabeth Warren was a capitalist from her head to her toe. Look, 3. 5 , ideal with numbers, 3. 5 unemployment, millions have jobs, millions have come off welfare, unfortunately, their job is to tell you how bad things are, how your lot in life is where it is because the wealthy are basically swooing you and amazingly, they poll and they think that it works and they are getting decent numbers, amazingly, but if any of these people move to c aracas or havana and experience the state taking over i think they changed their mind pretty quick. If were talking about just the markets and then Elizabeth Warren, we are just seeing i guess fear of missing out from a lot of investors youve got strong retail numbers that helped people a lot of amazon, for examp
Participants raised their hands and said yes. Thats an arguable position. There are arguments for and against that. But the first question you need to answer in this as in any other policy proposal is what is this going to cost. And there simply hasnt been very much interest or exploration in this question x. So thats why were releasing the two papers were releasing today and having this panel discussion, is precisely to get a sense of what it could cost us. Not definitive, these are estimates. Maybe theyll be different. Other people have other estimates. Wed love to see them, but nobody really has offered some concrete examination of what the consequences for taxpayers would be of these proposals. And so today were going to be, were releasing two papers to look at that. The first is a look at what the current cost to taxpayers are of, under current policy. The second is what the likely under a couple different scenarios costs would be. And this is a topic that needs to be injected int