Were not going to issue that statement that Rudy Giuliani wanted to include burisma in the 2016 elections, there was no white house meeting. Soon became clear to them that the Security Assistance was also at risk and that took on a renewed importance for them. Following the July 25th Call, it had to include that they would do the investigations of burisma which equaled the Biden Investigation into the ukraine interference. Was their concern about doing
the investigations or what . Where they supposed to make a statement about it . Ambassador sondland very clearly testified that all he ever heard mr. Giuliani or anyone say is that they only needed the public announcement of the investigation. Without that Public Statement that there would be no white house meeting. Yes. I was struck by how clear the evidence seems to be on this point and id like to play another example. Was they were a quid pro quo . As i testified previously with regard to the requested white house call, the answer is
Ahead and have your vote because he wants to get back to the business of the American People. A lot of good Talking Points with the economy and stock market so i think hes going to say im the president and focused on the business at hand and focused on something he believes is unimportant in the end. The event that he is doing today is on School Choice and a big issue for the republican party, hes got some results there and we have the president now talking about the horowitz report, we have that tape for you right here. President trump thank you very much. The ig report just came out and i was just briefed on it and its a disgrace what has happened with respect to the things that were done to our country. Should never again happen to another president. It is incredible, far worse than i wouldve ever thought
possible, and that is an embarrassment to our country, it is dishonest. It is everything that a lot of people thought it would be except far worse. So im going to get some very det
Proudly claimed that he had a plan but was keeping it secret. Last night, though, he indicated his plan was to tell generals to come up with a plan. So did he ever really have his own plan . Thats just one of the issues on the table today. Lets go right now to senior white house jim acosta live for us at that event. What are you expecting, jim . I think what well hear from donald trump here is hes going to make this argument hes better suited to be Commander In Chief of the United States. We expect him to make these remarks here in the next half an hour or so. Hes going to talk about, as you mentioned, that plan to talk to his generals on the first day he takes the oath of office, to come up with a plan for defeating isis. It is something he talked about at an event in greenville, North Carolina last night. Heres what he had to say. So were going to convene my top generals and give them a simple instruction. They will have 30 days to submit to the oval office a plan for soundly and qui
doesn t matter. well, i think the most important thing here is to recognize that iowans take their role in these caucuses very seriously, rachel. they re very deliberative. you know, if you know anything about iowa, many of them meet the candidates, a dozen or more times, they re at home events, house parties, they go to candidate forums. they get a chance to engage in individual conversations with the candidates. some of them are on a first name basis. so they cherish this role. and they protect it very jealously. so, look, when you have the endorsement of somebody like governor kim reynolds who s so widely and deeply respected, they take it under advisement, but this is their decision. this is their call. and what s really remarkable is what a contrast this is from 2016. in 2016 ted cruz was winning the evangelical vote with about a third of that vote, and trump was only getting about a fifth of that vote.
about politics or personal vendetta or about name-calling. this case is about the facts and the law. and mr. donald trump violated the law. i want everyone to know that the personal attacks really don t bother me. so the judge said that he will now take all their arguments under advisement and he said he would hope to make a decision in this cay boo end of the month but he said there was no promise or guarantee. the new york attorney general is asking the judge to find ill-gotten gains from the trump organization of $370 million to bar trump from doing business in new york and to put a five-year bar on his sons, eric trump and donald trump jr. very interesting moment in the courtroom where the state was giving their closing arguments. the judge questioned whether they had proven that the adult sons had committed any fraud. the judge saying what evidence do you have, i just haven t seen it, but they knew that there was