Our office does certify the funding though. Thats where we do work with the department of Public Health. Good, and certifying the funding means . We review the d. P. H. Says these are the costs and this is what we spent and we review it. Is this generating what the mayor would want to see, does that happen . I do not think so, but i can confirm that for you. Okay, cool. There was a fair look at mhsa last year indiscernible . System review. And were audited by the state so our quality review and our annual reviews have items related to mhsa outcomes. I know that theres a lot in here. One of the things that was in here that i was interested in that i did not know about but seems relevant to some of our current discussions around access is the behavioral access center. What is that, and what does that do . So is it a place . Yes, its 1380 howard. We are located were at the very right at the entrance lobby on the first floor there towards the left. I have heard of this. Yes. So it serves a
Understand me, then you can provide the services for the people thaw want to help because they have a place to live. You are doing it tailend, ass backwards. You have been doing this for well over several generations and thats why you have so many people homeless out on streets right now. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Next speaker, please. Well, i feel certain that you have the best of intentions but i ask, nonetheless, how is it that now while we are presently suing a number of important pharmaceuticals, manufacturers and their regional distributors for a significant sum of billions of dollars owing to their illegal conduct in the mass promotion of highly addictive substances and by we, i mean cities and counties and states throughout the county as plaintiffs in multiple lawsuits. Im glad that San Francisco has come around to join the litigation. How can it seem like a good idea for taxpayers, with the bill, for example, for Mental Health care, for all possibly opening the doo
An important but controversial part of its policy to deter migrants attempting to come to the uk illegally by boat. Joining me to discuss it on my panel for the next hour is the democratic strategist Mary Anne Marsh and Phillip Rycroft former permanent secretary in the department for exiting the european union. Also on the programme. Arizonas blistering heat wave continues as us President Biden heads to the state to promote his clean energy plans. Under an hour until the deadline for Donald Trumps legal team to respond to a Justice Departments request that could limit what information the former president is permitted to share publicly. First lets focus on the barge for Asylum Seekers here in the uk. The government hopes that around 500 men can be housed on board the vessel called the bibby stockholm. But so far, just 15 are on board. Ministers say the barge will be better value for taxpayers than hotel rooms, which are costing more than six Million Pounds a day. There have been concer
Have ever seen. I think it was, we dont want to put in first of all, theyre confidential. We dont want to put in anything that would restrict participation in or reporting of information but i have never understood so closed does not speak to the merits of the number of complaints received. Im wondering if theres a reason and i think there is, but if you could tell me again, i would appreciate it. You are correct. Because the complaint is closed doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in the quarterly and annual reports it breaks down it breaks out by department. Theres a table in quarterly reports or chart showing which percentage of complaints closed led to Depa
You can also measure a complaint that had merit found in wrong doing that was stopped. Thats another way to measure it. And thats never reflected in the analysis of the material i have ever seen. I think it was, we dont want to put in first of all, theyre confidential. We dont want to put in anything that would restrict participation in or reporting of information but i have never understood so closed does not speak to the merits of the number of complaints received. Im wondering if theres a reason and i think there is, but if you could tell me again, i would appreciate it. You are correct. Because the complaint is closed doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in